Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Dec;20(6):345-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.06.001.

Adolescent and young women's experience with the vaginal ring and oral contraceptive pills

Felicia H Stewart  1 , Beth A Brown, Tina R Raine, Tracy A Weitz, Cynthia C Harper
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adolescent and young women's experience with the vaginal ring and oral contraceptive pills

Felicia H Stewart et al. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Study objective: To compare acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring to that of oral contraceptive pills.

Design: Randomized, cross-over, 6-month study.

Setting: Urban family planning clinic for young low-income patients.

Participants: Sexually active females aged 15-21 years (n = 130).

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to use the vaginal ring or oral contraceptive pills for an initial study interval of three 28-day cycles, followed by three cycles of the alternate method.

Main outcome measures: Participants completed surveys about method use, acceptability, and side effects at baseline, after three cycles, and after six cycles. We analyzed study data using ANOVA models for cross-over designs.

Results: We did not detect higher compliance with the ring as compared to oral contraceptive pills (P = 0.176), although overall approval of the ring was significantly higher on several items measured, including liked using method (P = 0.015), would recommend it to friends (P = 0.012), and not as hard to remember to use method correctly (P < or = 0.000). Participants were less worried about health risks while using the ring (P = 0.006), but reported that the ring was more likely to interfere with sex than the pill (P < or = 0.001) and that sex partners liked the pill (P = 0.034). Most women did not report bothersome side effects with either method.

Conclusions: Adolescent and young women showed favorable acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring compared to oral contraceptive pills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Flow Chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, Rickerr VI, et al. Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year of use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:586. - PubMed
    1. Zibners A, Cromer BA, Hayes J. Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1999;12:90. - PubMed
    1. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Facts In Brief: Contraceptive Use. Alan Guttmacher Institute; 2005.
    1. Roumen FJ, Apter D, Mulders TM, et al. Efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinyl oestradiol. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:469. - PubMed
    1. Veres S, Miller L, Burington B. A comparison between the vaginal ring and oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:555. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances