Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb 15;366(3):834-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.044. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

Epibatidine binds to four sites on the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Affiliations

Epibatidine binds to four sites on the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Hideki Kawai et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. .

Abstract

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) from Torpedo electric organ is a pentamer of homologous subunits. This receptor is generally thought to carry two high affinity sites for agonists under equilibrium conditions. Here we demonstrate directly that each Torpedo nAChR carries at least four binding sites for the potent neuronal nAChR agonist, epibatidine, i.e., twice as many sites as for alpha-bungarotoxin. Using radiolabeled ligand binding techniques, we show that the binding of [(3)H]-(+/-)-epibatidine is heterogeneous and is characterized by two classes of binding sites with equilibrium dissociation constants of about 15nM and 1muM. These classes of sites exist in approximately equal numbers and all [(3)H]-(+/-)-epibatidine binding is competitively displaced by acetylcholine, suberyldicholine and d-tubocurarine. These results provide further evidence for the complexity of agonist binding to the nAChR and underscore the difficulties in determining simple relationships between site occupancy and functional responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The equilibrium binding of [3H]-(±)-epibatidine to Torpedo membranes (0.5 µM in α-BTx binding sites) was measured by a centrifugation assay. (A) The dashed line represents the best fit for binding to a single population of sites with Bmax = 0.88 µM and Kd = 34 nM. The solid line shows a better fit to a two component model with Bmax1 = 0.56 µM, Kd1 = 13.5 nM, Bmax2 = 0.38 µM and Kd2 = 0.29 µM. (B) A Scatchard transformation of the data in (A) with the solid line calculated using the parameters obtained from the two component model in (A).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The binding of [3H]-(±)-epibatidine to Torpedo membranes (5 µM in α-BTx sites) was measured by equilibrium dialysis. [3H]-(±)-epibatidine binds to approximately twice as many sites as α-BTx and fitting by a two state model gave Bmax1 = 4.96 µM, Kd1 = 10.4 nM, Bmax2 = 5.95 µM, Kd2 = 0.98 µM. The curve for total binding (●) includes a non-specific binding (○) component of 0.0106 µM bound/µM free measured the presence of excess unlabelled ligand. Data are averaged from two independent experiments and are representative of five similar assays carried out using high concentrations of nAChR (2.5 – 5 µM in α-BTx sites).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Displacement of radiolabelled agonist by unlabelled ligands. In each case the receptor concentration was 0.3 µM in α-BTx sites. (A) Displacement of [3H]ACh (1 µM) by ACh (○) was well described by a simple sigmoidal curve giving IC50 = 0.60 µM and nH = 1 whereas the effects of (±)epibatidine (■) was biphasic giving IC50(1) = 0.148 µM, IC50(2) = 8.05 µM and FH = 0.528. Corresponding data for (+)-epibatidine (▲) gave IC50(1) = 0.307 µM, IC50(2) = 61.6 µM and FH = 0.56. (B) Displacement of [3H]-(±)-epibatidine (0.5 µM) by ACh (○) was biphasic and curve fitting gave IC50(1) = 0.36 µM, IC50(2) = 11.5 µM and FH = 0.644. In contrast displacement by (±)-epibatidine (■) can be described by a one-component fit with IC50 = 0.47 µM and nH = 1. (C) Displacement of [3H]-SbCh (1 µM) by ACh (○) was best described by a sigmoidal curve with IC50 = 1.39 µM and nH = 0.733. The effects of (±)-epibatidine (■) were described by a similar model with IC50 = 2.34 µM and nH = 0.598.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The effects of receptor inhibitors on the binding of [3H]-(±)-epibatidine. [3H]-(±)-epibatidine (0.5 µM) was incubated with nAChR enriched membranes (0.3 µM in α-BTx sites) and the effects of d-tubocurarine (●), β-erythroidine (○), chlorpromazine HCl (▼) and MTPP-Br (◇) were measured using a centrifugation assay. Only d-tubocurarine caused significant displacement below 100 µM and the data were best fit by a sigmoidal competition curve with IC50 = 22.1 µM and nH = 0.681.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lester HA, Dibas MI, Dahan DS, Leite JF, Dougherty DA. Cys-loop receptors: new twists and turns. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:329–336. - PubMed
    1. Corringer PJ, Le Novere N, Changeux JP. Nicotinic receptors at the amino acid level. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2000;40:431–458. - PubMed
    1. Sine SM. The nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain. J. Neurobiol. 2002;53:431–446. - PubMed
    1. Karlin A. Emerging structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;3:102–114. - PubMed
    1. Brejc K, van Dijk WJ, Klassen RV, Schuurmans M, van Der Oost J, Smit AB, Sixma TK. Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature. 2001;411:269–276. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources