Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;9(3):442-57.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm044. Epub 2007 Dec 14.

Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks

Affiliations

Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks

B Nebiyou Bekele et al. Biostatistics. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Late-onset (LO) toxicities are a serious concern in many phase I trials. Since most dose-limiting toxicities occur soon after therapy begins, most dose-finding methods use a binary indicator of toxicity occurring within a short initial time period. If an agent causes LO toxicities, however, an undesirably large number of patients may be treated at toxic doses before any toxicities are observed. A method addressing this problem is the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM, Cheung and Chappell, 2000). We propose a Bayesian dose-finding method similar to the TITE-CRM in which doses are chosen using time-to-toxicity data. The new aspect of our method is a set of rules, based on predictive probabilities, that temporarily suspend accrual if the risk of toxicity at prospective doses for future patients is unacceptably high. If additional follow-up data reduce the predicted risk of toxicity to an acceptable level, then accrual is restarted, and this process may be repeated several times during the trial. A simulation study shows that the proposed method provides a greater degree of safety than the TITE-CRM, while still reliably choosing the preferred dose. This advantage increases with accrual rate, but the price of this additional safety is that the trial takes longer to complete on average.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Illustration of the PRT method for a hypothetical phase I trial. We assume that patients arrive in 6-day intervals. The horizontal axis represents the days since first patient enrolled into the trial. Each horizontal line is the time course of a patient. Numerical values preceding each time course represent the dose administered to that patient. Open circles indicate times at which patients were fully evaluated without toxicity and x's indicate toxicity times. Darker gray denotes periods when accrual was open. Lighter gray denotes periods when accrual was suspended.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Hazard functions and cumulative toxicity probabilities of the piecewise exponential distribution used in the simulations.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of toxicities observed using the PRT method and TITE-CRM under scenario 1 with varying accrual rates. Each toxicity percentage is labeled by the mean trial duration in years.

References

    1. Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polytomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1993;88:669–679.
    1. Albert JH, Chib S. Sequential ordinal modeling with applications to survival data. Biometrics. 2001;57:829–836. - PubMed
    1. Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S. Cancer phase I clinical trials; escalation with overdose control. Statistics in Medicine. 1998;17:1103–1120. - PubMed
    1. Cheung Y-K, Chappell R. Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities. Biometrics. 2000;56:1177–1182. - PubMed
    1. Dunson DB, Neelon B. Bayesian inference on order-constrained parameters in generalized linear models. Biometrics. 2003;59:286–295. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances