Heart disease management by women: does intervention format matter?
- PMID: 18084052
- PMCID: PMC3331992
- DOI: 10.1177/1090198107309458
Heart disease management by women: does intervention format matter?
Abstract
A randomized controlled trial of two formats of a program (Women Take PRIDE) to enhance management of heart disease by patients was conducted. Older women (N = 575) were randomly assigned to a group or self-directed format or to a control group. Data regarding symptoms, functional health status, and weight were collected at baseline and at 4, 12, and 18 months. The formats produced different outcomes. At 18 months, the self-directed format was better than the control in reducing the number (p < or = .02), frequency (p < or = .03), and bothersomeness (p < or = .02) of cardiac symptoms. The self-directed format was also better than the group format in reducing symptom frequency of all types (p < or = .04). The group format improved ambulation at 12 months (p < or = .04) and weight loss at 18 months (p < or = .03), and group participants were more likely to complete the program ( p < or = .05). The availability of different learning formats could enhance management of cardiovascular disease by patients.
Figures
References
-
- Abbey S, Stewart D. Gender and psychosomatic aspects of ischemic heart disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2000;48:417. - PubMed
-
- Ades PA, Savage PD, Brawner CA, Lyon CE, Ehrman JK, Bunn JY, et al. Aerobic capacity in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation. 2006;113(23):2706–2712. - PubMed
-
- American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2006.
-
- Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
