Individual delirium symptoms: do they matter?
- PMID: 18084841
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000284506.43390.f3
Individual delirium symptoms: do they matter?
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of individual manifestations of delirium on outcome, describe them in critically ill adults, and validate nurses' bedside item assessments from the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC).
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Single 16-bed medical/surgical university hospital intensive care unit.
Patients: Six hundred consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit for >24 hrs.
Interventions: All patients were evaluated with the eight-item ICDSC throughout their intensive care unit stay. In all patients scoring positive on any ICDSC item, individual checklist items were tallied throughout the intensive care unit stay and assessed for impact on mortality. In addition, when the ICDSC score indicated delirium (> or = 4 of 8), the subsequent overall frequency of each item was also independently documented to describe delirious patient symptoms. ICDSC items were tested for discrimination between delirious and nondelirious patients. Throughout the study, the validity of bedside delirium assessments was assessed in 30 nurses.
Measurements and main results: We were able to assess 537 patients. In nondelirious patients, psychomotor agitation by ICDSC assessment was associated with a higher risk of mortality after adjustment for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, age, and the presence of coma. One hundred eight-nine patients (35.1%) developed delirium (i.e., ICDSC score > or = 4). On presentation (and throughout the intensive care unit stay), the most frequent features of delirium were inattention, disorientation, and psychomotor agitation. Each ICDSC item was highly discriminating between delirious vs. nondelirious patients. Correlation between gold standard adjudicators and nurses for the overall bedside evaluations of delirium were excellent (Pearson's correlation R = 0.924, p < .0005). Individual symptom evaluation by nurses varied: Alteration in level of consciousness was poorest (R = 0.681, p < .0005), and both disorientation and hallucinations evaluated best (R = 1.000).
Conclusions: In nondelirious patients, agitation was associated with a higher risk of mortality. Each of the eight ICDSC items is highly discriminating for the diagnosis of delirium, suggesting that any screening or diagnostic scales should incorporate them. Quality assurance and educational efforts should, therefore, emphasize independent assessment of the individual features of delirium.
Comment in
-
Less confusion and greater clarity regarding delirium.Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2645-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000288081.84941.61. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 18075372 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for delirium with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC): Symptom profile and utility of individual items in the identification of delirium dependent on the level of sedation.Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000202. Epub 2018 May 24. Palliat Support Care. 2019. PMID: 29792239
-
Comparison of CAM-ICU and ICDSC for the detection of delirium in critically ill patients focusing on relevant clinical outcomes.J Crit Care. 2012 Apr;27(2):212-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jul 6. J Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 21737237
-
Predicting hospital mortality and length of stay: A prospective cohort study comparing the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist versus Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit.Aust Crit Care. 2023 May;36(3):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Aust Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 35272910
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC in detecting intensive care unit delirium: A bivariate meta-analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103782. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021. PMID: 33120134
-
The predictive value of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit and intensive care delirium screening checklist for delirium in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Nov;29(6):1224-1235. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13064. Epub 2024 Mar 27. Nurs Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38538305
Cited by
-
Preoperative Risk Factors for Subsyndromal Delirium in Older Adults Who Undergo Joint Replacement Surgery.Orthop Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;36(6):402-411. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000401. Orthop Nurs. 2017. PMID: 29189623 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Subsyndromal Delirium.Psychosomatics. 2015 Nov-Dec;56(6):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 15. Psychosomatics. 2015. PMID: 26198571 Free PMC article.
-
Plasma tryptophan and tyrosine levels are independent risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients.Intensive Care Med. 2009 Nov;35(11):1886-92. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1573-6. Epub 2009 Jul 9. Intensive Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19588122 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and risk factors related to haloperidol use for delirium in adult intensive care patients: the multinational AID-ICU inception cohort study.Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1081-1089. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5204-y. Epub 2018 May 16. Intensive Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29767323
-
Impact of quetiapine on resolution of individual delirium symptoms in critically ill patients with delirium: a post-hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R215. doi: 10.1186/cc10450. Epub 2011 Sep 17. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21923923 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical