This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2007 Dec 24;204(13):3052-3.

doi: 10.1084/jem.20072544. Epub 2007 Dec 17.

Show me the data

Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill

PMID: 18086866
PMCID: PMC2150990
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20072544

Editorial

Show me the data

Mike Rossner et al. J Exp Med. 2007.

. 2007 Dec 24;204(13):3052-3.

doi: 10.1084/jem.20072544. Epub 2007 Dec 17.

Authors

Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill

PMID: 18086866
PMCID: PMC2150990
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20072544

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
©cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.
Scully C. Scully C. Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):130-4. Community Dent Health. 2007. PMID: 17958071
The delicate topic of the impact factor.
Kirchhof B, Bornfeld N, Grehn F. Kirchhof B, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;245(7):925-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0618-1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17562062 No abstract available.
Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
Colquhoun D. Colquhoun D. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):479; discussion 480. doi: 10.1038/423479a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12774093 No abstract available.
The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW. Jones AW. Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. PMID: 16784827 Review.
[How to improve the statistical quality of articles presented to biomedical journals: a checklist for authors].
Mora i Ripoll R. Mora i Ripoll R. Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Jul 3;113(4):138-49. Med Clin (Barc). 1999. PMID: 10472600 Review. Spanish. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Impact beyond the impact factor.
Zupanc GK. Zupanc GK. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Feb;200(2):113-6. doi: 10.1007/s00359-013-0863-1. Epub 2013 Nov 22. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014. PMID: 24264238
Impact factor of medical education journals and recently developed indices: Can any of them support academic promotion criteria?
Azer SA, Holen A, Wilson I, Skokauskas N. Azer SA, et al. J Postgrad Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;62(1):32-9. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.173202. J Postgrad Med. 2016. PMID: 26732194 Free PMC article.
System crash.
Ségalat L. Ségalat L. EMBO Rep. 2010 Feb;11(2):86-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.278. Epub 2010 Jan 15. EMBO Rep. 2010. PMID: 20075987 Free PMC article.
Research blogging: indexing and registering the change in science 2.0.
Fausto S, Machado FA, Bento LF, Iamarino A, Nahas TR, Munger DS. Fausto S, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050109. Epub 2012 Dec 12. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23251358 Free PMC article.
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of PubMed-Indexed Biomedical Publications in Oman from years 2005-2009.
Rohra DK, Azam SI. Rohra DK, et al. Oman Med J. 2011 May;26(3):160-5. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.39. Oman Med J. 2011. PMID: 22043407 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12.
1. Wells, W.A. 2007. The returning tide: how China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base. J. Cell Biol. 176:376–401 10.1083/jcb.200701150. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Editorial. 2006. Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided. Nature. 441:786 10.1038/441786a. - DOI - PubMed
1. Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003–1004 10.1038/4351003a. - DOI
1. The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- H1 Connect - Access expert opinions and insights on biomedical research.