Show me the data

Editorial

Mike Rossner et al. J Cell Biol. 2007.

. 2007 Dec 17;179(6):1091-2.

doi: 10.1083/jcb.200711140.

No abstract available

Figures

Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientific.
Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Rossner M, et al. J Cell Biol. 2008 Jan 28;180(2):254-5. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200801036. Epub 2008 Jan 11. J Cell Biol. 2008. PMID: 18192491 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

1. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12
1. Wells, W.A. 2007. The returning tide: how China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base. J. Cell Biol. 176:376–401 doi:10.1083/jcb.200701150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Editorial. 2006. Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided. Nature. 441:786 doi:10.1038/441786b - DOI - PubMed
1. Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003–1004 doi:10.1038/4351003b - DOI - PubMed
1. The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed