Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2007 Dec 17;179(6):1091-2.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200711140.

Show me the data

Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill
Editorial

Show me the data

Mike Rossner et al. J Cell Biol. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
©cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Show me the data.
    Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Rossner M, et al. J Exp Med. 2007 Dec 24;204(13):3052-3. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072544. Epub 2007 Dec 17. J Exp Med. 2007. PMID: 18086866 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Don Quixote, David and me.
    Freda MC. Freda MC. Nurs Outlook. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):58-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.11.008. Nurs Outlook. 2006. PMID: 16523575 No abstract available.
  • Desktop research--bibliographic databases and electronic journals.
    Kerwin D. Kerwin D. J Sports Sci. 2000 Oct;18(10):777-8. doi: 10.1080/026404100419829. J Sports Sci. 2000. PMID: 11201954 No abstract available.
  • Specialist Bibliographic Databases.
    Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Gerasimov AN, Kitas GD. Gasparyan AY, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Korean Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27134485 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.
    Wallin JA. Wallin JA. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16236137 Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12
    1. Wells, W.A. 2007. The returning tide: how China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base. J. Cell Biol. 176:376–401 doi:10.1083/jcb.200701150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Editorial. 2006. Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided. Nature. 441:786 doi:10.1038/441786b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003–1004 doi:10.1038/4351003b - DOI - PubMed
    1. The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types