Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis
- PMID: 18086987
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.12.1194
Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of timing of surgical intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis.
Design: Retrospective study of 53 patients and a systematic review.
Setting: A tertiary referral center. Main Outcome Measure Mortality.
Results: Median timing of the intervention was 28 days. Eighty-three percent of patients had infected necrosis and 55% had preoperative organ failure. The mortality rate was 36%. Sixteen patients were operated on within 14 days of initial admission, 11 patients from day 15 to 29, and 26 patients on day 30 or later. This latter group received preoperative antibiotics for a longer period (P < .001), and Candida species and antibiotic-resistant organisms were more often cultured from the pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis in these patients (P = .02). The 30-day group also had the lowest mortality (8% vs 75% in the 1 to 14-days group and 45% in the 15 to 29-days group, P < .001); this difference persisted when outcome was stratified for preoperative organ failure. During the second half of the study, necrosectomy was further postponed (43 vs 20 days, P = .06) and mortality decreased (22% vs 47%, P = .09). We also reviewed 11 studies with a total of 1136 patients. Median surgical patient volume was 8.3 patients per year (range, 5.3-15.6), median timing of surgical intervention was 26 days (range, 3-31), and median mortality was 25% (range, 6%-56%). We observed a significant correlation between timing of intervention and mortality (R = - 0.603; 95% confidence interval, - 2.10 to - 0.02; P = .05).
Conclusion: Postponing necrosectomy until 30 days after initial hospital admission is associated with decreased mortality, prolonged use of antibiotics, and increased incidence of Candida species and antibiotic-resistant organisms.
Similar articles
-
[The timing and mode of surgery in patients with severe acute pancreatitis].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1998 Apr;36(4):215-7. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1998. PMID: 11825370 Chinese.
-
Outcome after pancreatic necrosectomy: trends over 12 years at an Indian centre.ANZ J Surg. 2006 Aug;76(8):704-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03835.x. ANZ J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16916387
-
Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy.Surgery. 2005 May;137(5):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.01.003. Surgery. 2005. PMID: 15855920
-
[Complex treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis].Orv Hetil. 1998 Sep 20;139(38):2235-40. Orv Hetil. 1998. PMID: 9775652 Review. Hungarian.
-
Meta-analysis of prophylactic antibiotic use in acute necrotizing pancreatitis.Br J Surg. 2006 Jun;93(6):674-84. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5389. Br J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16703633 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: redefining the role of surgery.World J Surg. 2012 May;36(5):1142-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1504-5. World J Surg. 2012. PMID: 22382765
-
Necrotizing pancreatitis: A review for the acute care surgeon.Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):927-934. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.027. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Am J Surg. 2021. PMID: 32878690 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Intra-abdominal infections.GMS Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 26;8:Doc13. doi: 10.3205/id000057. eCollection 2020. GMS Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32373438 Free PMC article.
-
A standardized method for endoscopic necrosectomy improves complication and mortality rates.Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Pancreatology. 2016. PMID: 26748428 Free PMC article.
-
Early versus delayed necrosectomy in pancreatic necrosis: A population-based cohort study on readmission, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital mortality.World J Methodol. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):91810. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.91810. eCollection 2024 Sep 20. World J Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39310231 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources