Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar;34(3):523-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0957-8. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

Spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation in experimental lung injury: effects on hepatic blood flow

Affiliations

Spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation in experimental lung injury: effects on hepatic blood flow

Rudolf Hering et al. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Positive pressure ventilation can affect systemic haemodynamics and regional blood flow distribution with negative effects on hepatic blood flow. We hypothesized that spontaneous breathing (SB) with airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) provides better systemic and hepatic blood flow than APRV without SB.

Design: Animal study with a randomized cross-over design.

Setting: Animal laboratory of Bonn University Hospital.

Subjects: Twelve pigs with oleic-acid-induced lung injury.

Interventions: APRV with or without SB in random order. Without SB, either the upper airway pressure limit or the ventilator rate was increased to maintain constant pH and PaCO2.

Measurements and results: Systemic haemodynamics were determined by double-indicator dilution, organ blood flow by coloured microspheres. Systemic blood flow was best during APRV with SB. During APRV with SB blood flow (ml g(-1) min(-1)) was 0.91+/-0.26 (hepatic arterial), 0.29+/-0.05 (stomach), 0.64+/-0.08 (duodenum), 0.62+/-0.10 (jejunum), 0.53+/-0.07 (ileum), 0.53+/-0.07 (colon), 0.46+/-0.09 (pancreas) and 3.59+/-0.55 (spleen). During APRV without SB applying high P(aw) it decreased to 0.13+/-0.01 (stomach), 0.37+/-0.03 (duodenum), 0.29+/-0.03 (jejunum), 0.31+/-0.05 (ileum), 0.32+/-0.03 (colon) and 0.23+/-0.04 (pancreas) p<0.01, respectively. During APRV without SB applying same Paw limits it decreased to 0.18+/-0.03 (stomach, p<0.01), 0.47+/-0.06 (duodenum, p<0.05), 0.38+/-0.05 (jejunum, p<0.01), 0.36+/-0.03 (ileum, p<0.05), 0.39+/-0.05 (colon, p<0.05), and 0.27+/-0.04 (pancreas, p<0.01). Arterial liver blood flow did not change significantly when SB was abolished (0.55+/-0.11 and 0.63+/-0.11, respectively).

Conclusions: Maintaining SB during APRV was associated with better systemic and pre-portal organ blood flow. Improvement in hepatic arterial blood flow was not significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Intensive Care Med. 1997 May;23(5):493-503 - PubMed
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;152(2):504-10 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1997 Jan;111(1):180-7 - PubMed
    1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;454:435-40 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1976 Aug;111(8):881-3 - PubMed

Publication types