Measuring and decomposing inequity in self-reported morbidity and self-assessed health in Thailand
- PMID: 18088434
- PMCID: PMC2242789
- DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-23
Measuring and decomposing inequity in self-reported morbidity and self-assessed health in Thailand
Abstract
Background: In recent years, interest in the study of inequalities in health has not stopped at quantifying their magnitude; explaining the sources of inequalities has also become of great importance. This paper measures socioeconomic inequalities in self-reported morbidity and self-assessed health in Thailand, and the contributions of different population subgroups to those inequalities.
Methods: The Health and Welfare Survey 2003 conducted by the Thai National Statistical Office with 37,202 adult respondents is used for the analysis. The health outcomes of interest derive from three self-reported morbidity and two self-assessed health questions. Socioeconomic status is measured by adult-equivalent monthly income per household member. The concentration index (CI) of ill health is used as a measure of socioeconomic health inequalities, and is subsequently decomposed into contributing factors.
Results: The CIs reveal inequality gradients disadvantageous to the poor for both self-reported morbidity and self-assessed health in Thailand. The magnitudes of these inequalities were higher for the self-assessed health outcomes than for the self-reported morbidity outcomes. Age and sex played significant roles in accounting for the inequality in reported chronic illness (33.7 percent of the total inequality observed), hospital admission (27.8 percent), and self-assessed deterioration of health compared to a year ago (31.9 percent). The effect of being female and aged 60 years or older was by far the strongest demographic determinant of inequality across all five types of health outcome. Having a low socioeconomic status as measured by income quintile, education and work status were the main contributors disadvantaging the poor in self-rated health compared to a year ago (47.1 percent) and self-assessed health compared to peers (47.4 percent). Residence in the rural Northeast and rural North were the main regional contributors to inequality in self-reported recent and chronic illness, while residence in the rural Northeast was the major contributor to the tendency of the poor to report lower levels of self-assessed health compared to peers.
Conclusion: The findings confirm that substantial socioeconomic inequalities in health as measured by self-reported morbidity and self-assessed health exist in Thailand. Decomposition analysis shows that inequalities in health status are associated with particular demographic, socioeconomic and geographic population subgroups. Vulnerable subgroups which are prone to both ill health and relative poverty warrant targeted policy attention.
Figures
References
-
- Chadwick E. Report to Her Majesty's principal secretary of state for the Home Department. In: Chadwick E, Flinn MW, Great Britain. Poor Law Commissioners, editor. Report on the sanitary condition of the labouring population of Great Britain 1842. Edinburgh , University Press; 1965.
-
- Farr W. First annual report of the Registrar General. London , Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO); 1839. Letter to the Registrar General.
-
- Virchow RLK. Report on the typhus epidemic in Upper Silesia. In: Virchow RLK, Rather LJ, editor. Collected essays on public health and epidemiology. Canton, MA , Science History Publications ; 1848.
-
- Acheson D, Barker D, Chambers J, Graham H, Marmot M, Whitehead M. The report of the independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London , The Stationery Office; 1998.
-
- Black D, Townsend P, Davidson N, Working Group on Inequalities in Health. Inequalities in health: the Black report. Harmondsworth , Penguin Books; 1982.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
