Hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type a: rationale for their individual and combined use for injectable facial rejuvenation
- PMID: 18090346
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000248857.84859.07
Hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type a: rationale for their individual and combined use for injectable facial rejuvenation
Abstract
Soft-tissue augmentation has seen a renaissance of interest, as an increasing number of patients seek aesthetic improvement without major downtime. Although injectable agents for soft-tissue augmentation have been widely available for more than 20 years, the renewed interest has been fueled in part by the introduction of botulinum toxin type A. The unequivocal establishment of predictable and aesthetic results, initially and primarily in the upper face, created a need for an agent that would work equally well in the lower face and that could be administered in an office setting. The marriage of these two injectables (hyaluronic acid and botulinum toxin type A) began with the escalating popularity of both of these substances individually and the realization that a more global aesthetic enhancement is provided by combining these agents in custom proportions to achieve maximum aesthetic effects. Although the authors discuss most of the related, available hyaluronic acid and botulinum toxin agents, their clinical experiences, and the scientific data regarding these products, they realize that the discussions have been weighted toward the products that have been available for use in the United States the longest. In this article, they attempt to explain some of the results of prior (to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval) studies that have been the subject themselves of some confusion, and provide a rationale for using hyaluronic acids and botulinum toxin for facial enhancement independently and in combination.
Similar articles
-
The role of hyaluronic acid fillers (Restylane) in facial cosmetic surgery: review and technical considerations.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Nov;120(6 Suppl):41S-54S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000248794.63898.0f. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID: 18090342 Review.
-
Complications in fillers and Botox.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;21(1):13-21, v. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2008.11.001. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009. PMID: 19185791
-
Upper face rejuvenation using botulinum toxin and hyaluronic acid fillers.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013 Jan-Feb;79(1):32-40. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.104667. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013. PMID: 23254727
-
Injectable treatments for the aging face.Facial Plast Surg. 2006 May;22(2):140-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-947720. Facial Plast Surg. 2006. PMID: 16847805
-
Soft tissue augmentation 2006: filler fantasy.Dermatol Ther. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00066.x. Dermatol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16784511 Review.
References
-
- Carruthers, J. D., Lowe, N. J., Menter, M. A., Gibson, J., and Eadie, N. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type a for patients with glabellar lines. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 112: 21S, 2003.
-
- Ascher, B., Zakine, B., Kestemont, P., Baspeyras, M., Bougara, A., and Santini, J. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety of 3 doses of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 51: 223, 2004.
-
- Spiegel, J. H. Treatment of periorbital rhytids with botulinum toxin type A: Maximizing safety and results. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 7: 198, 2005.
-
- DeLustro, F., Condell, R. A., Nguyen, M., et al. A comparative study of the biologic and immunologic response to medical devices derived from dermal collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 20: 109, 1986.
-
- Klein, A. W., and Rish, D. C. Injectable collagen: An adjunct to facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast. Surg. 4: 87, 1987.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources