Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan;18(1):71-7.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f19d01.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future

Affiliations
Review

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future

John Kurhanewicz et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to review the current status of advanced MRI techniques based on anatomic, metabolic and physiologic properties of prostate cancer with a focus on their impact in managing prostate cancer patients.

Recent findings: Prostate cancer can be identified based on reduced T2 signal intensity on MRI, increased choline and decreased citrate and polyamines on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), decreased diffusivity on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and increased uptake on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging. All can be obtained within a 60-min 3T magnetic resonance exam. Each complementary method has inherent advantages and disadvantages: T2 MRI has high sensitivity but poor specificity; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging has high specificity but poor sensitivity; diffusion tensor imaging has high spatial resolution, is the fastest, but sensitivity/specificity needs to be established; dynamic contrast enhanced imaging has high spatial resolution, but requires a gadolinium based contrast agent injection, and sensitivity/specificity needs to be established.

Summary: The best characterization of prostate cancer in individual patients will most likely result from a multiparametric (MRI/MRSI/DTI/DCE) exam using 3T magnetic resonance scanners but questions remain as to how to analyze and display this large amount of imaging data, and how to optimally combine the data for the most accurate assessment of prostate cancer. Histological correlations or clinical outcomes are required to determine sensitivity/specificity for each method and optimal combinations of these approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of a multiparametric 3T magnetic resonance exam of a 55-year-old patient with a prostate specific antigen of 8.46 ng/ml and biopsy-proven cancer (left apex, 1/12 cores having 5 mm of G3+3) (a) T2 weighted MRI showing a region of low signal intensity lesion (red arrows) in the right apex. (b) Corresponding spectral 0.16cm3 array showing abnormal spectra (red box) in the same region as the suspicious region of low T2 signal intensity. (c) A calculated water diffusion image demonstrating a reduction in intensity in the region of prostate cancer. (d) The contrast uptake curves from the region of prostate cancer (yellow) was more dramatic and washed-out faster than healthy prostate peripheral zone (green) tissue on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Prostate cancer in the left apex was confirmed at surgery.

References

    1. Phillips ME, Kressel HY, Spritzer CE, et al. Prostatic disorders: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1987;164:386–392. - PubMed
    1. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D, et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology. 1994;193:703–709. - PubMed
    1. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB, et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162:331–336. - PubMed
    1. Carrol CL, Sommer FG, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. The abnormal prostate: MR imaging at 1.5 T with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1987;163:521–525. - PubMed
    1. Bezzi M, Kressel HY, Allen KS, et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1988;169:339–346. - PubMed

Publication types