Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):134-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Nov 23.

Behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences in the rabbit

Affiliations

Behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences in the rabbit

Charles S Ebert Jr et al. Hear Res. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

An important cue for sound localization and separation of signals from noise is the interaural time difference (ITD). Humans are able to localize sounds within 1-2 degrees and can detect very small changes in the ITD (10-20micros). In contrast, many animals localize sounds with less precision than humans. Rabbits, for example, have sound localization thresholds of approximately 22 degrees . There is only limited information about behavioral ITD discrimination in animals with poor sound localization acuity that are typically used for the neural recordings. For this study, we measured behavioral discrimination of ITDs in the rabbit for a range of reference ITDs from 0 to +/-300micros. The behavioral task was conditioned avoidance and the stimulus was band-limited noise (500-1500Hz). Across animals, the average discrimination threshold was 50-60micros for reference ITDs of 0 to +/-200micros. There was no trend in the thresholds across this range of reference ITDs. For a reference ITD of +/-300micros, which is near the limit of the physiological window defined by the head width in this species, the discrimination threshold increased to approximately 100micros. The ITD discrimination in rabbits less acute than in cats, which have a similar head size. This result supports the suggestion that ITD discrimination, like sound localization [see Heffner, 1997. Acta Otolaryngol. 532 (Suppl.), 46-53] is determined by factors other than head size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of individual tracks used to determine the behavioral JND via a staircase tracking procedure. A. Example of a single track. The reference ITD was 0 μs. The last six reversals (open circles) were used to compute the threshold for the track (dashed line at 60 μs). B. All tracks used to compute the JND for this reference ITD. The JND (dashed line) for a given reference ITD was the difference between the reference ITD and the average of the thresholds (arrow), and in this case was 56 μs. C. The psychometric function derived from the tracks in B. The parameters of the function are given, including the midpoint of the function (m), the slope (s), the lapse (PL) the y-intercept (y(0)), and the percent variance accounted for (r2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
JNDs for different reference ITDs in different animals. A. JNDs for one subject tested for reference ITDs lateralized to both sides. The arrows indicate the direction of tracking. Most points were taken from tracks using 20 μs steps; two tracks (asterisks) used 10 μs steps. One point (open circle) was taken while tracking the normal instead of the warning sound. B. The JNDs measured in two other animals. C. All of the data from the three animals, plotted as if lateralized to the same side in each case. The average JNDs are shown by the thick line.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Psychometric functions. A. Functions for the positive reference ITDs for animal 1. B. Functions for the negative reference ITDs for animal 1. C. Functions for the positive reference ITDs for animal 2. D. Functions for a reference ITD at 0 μs for animal 1 using either the best 50% of tracks (filled circles) or all of the tracks (open circles).

References

    1. Bala AD, Spitzer MW, Takahashi TT. Prediction of auditory spatial acuity from neural images on the owl’s auditory space map. Nature. 2003;424:771–774. - PubMed
    1. Bargones JY, Werner LA, Marean GC. Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;98:99–111. - PubMed
    1. Borg E, Engstrom B. Hearing thresholds in the rabbit. A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983;95:19–26. - PubMed
    1. Brown CH, Beecher MD, Moody DB, Stebbins WC. Localization of noise bands by Old World monkeys. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980;68:127–132. - PubMed
    1. Coffey CS, Ebert CS, Jr, Marshall AF, Skaggs JD, Falk SE, Crocker WD, Pearson JM, Fitzpatrick DC. Detection of interaural correlation by neurons in the superior olivary complex, inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the unanesthetized rabbit. Hear Res. 2006;221:1–16. - PubMed

Publication types