Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;29(2):103-9.
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f20e45.

Investigation of normal ranges for left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac gated blood pool imaging studies using different processing workstations

Affiliations

Investigation of normal ranges for left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac gated blood pool imaging studies using different processing workstations

Sarah C Hiscock et al. Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Background: An investigation has been undertaken to calculate normal ranges for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by the gated blood pool (GBP) technique. A common set of normal studies was used at 11 hospitals within the south of England to assess the variability of results and normal ranges.

Methods: Normal studies were identified by retrospective review of patients who had undergone a GBP study and echocardiogram at the Royal United Hospital, Bath. Patients who had left ventricular function qualitatively identified as normal on echocardiogram and normal wall motion for the GBP were included. In total, 64 datasets were found to match the criteria. All the studies were made anonymous prior to being distributed to the participating hospitals. The upper and lower limits for normal ejection fraction were defined for each system using the 95% confidence limits around the mean value, before and after normalizing the results to remove systematic differences between the processing systems.

Results: The lower cut-off for normal function varied between 40 and 51%. Analysis of the individual operator results gave an inter-operator standard deviation of 4.2 and an intra-operator standard deviation of 2.7.

Conclusions: It is recommended that all studies should be processed at least twice and an average taken to minimise these sources of uncertainty. If there is a significant difference the study should be reprocessed. Due to random differences between results from different systems it is suggested that an equivocal range be used between clearly normal and abnormal function.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources