Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec 20;569(2):429-433.
doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.152.

An overview of fast convergent ordered-subsets reconstruction methods for emission tomography based on the incremental EM algorithm

Affiliations

An overview of fast convergent ordered-subsets reconstruction methods for emission tomography based on the incremental EM algorithm

Ing-Tsung Hsiao et al. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. .

Abstract

Statistical reconstruction has become popular in emission computed tomography but suffers slow convergence (to the MAP or ML solution). Methods proposed to address this problem include the fast but non-convergent OSEM and the convergent RAMLA [1] for the ML case, and the convergent BSREM [2], relaxed OS-SPS and modified BSREM [3] for the MAP case. The convergent algorithms required a user-determined relaxation schedule. We proposed fast convergent OS reconstruction algorithms for both ML and MAP cases, called COSEM (Complete-data OSEM), which avoid the use of a relaxation schedule while maintaining convergence. COSEM is a form of incremental EM algorithm. Here, we provide a derivation of our COSEM algorithms and demonstrate COSEM using simulations. At early iterations, COSEM-ML is typically slower than RAMLA, and COSEM-MAP is typically slower than optimized BSREM while remaining much faster than conventional MAP-EM. We discuss how COSEM may be modified to overcome these limitations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 2D 64×64 phantom is shown in (a), while the anecdotal reconstructions are displayed in (b) EM-MAP, (c) COSEM-MAP, and (d) BSREM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Normalized objective difference for EM-MAP, COSEM-MAP, and BSREM at L=8.

References

    1. Browne J, De Pierro A. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15(5):687. - PubMed
    1. De Pierro A, Yamagishi M. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(4):280. - PubMed
    1. Ahn S, Fessler JA. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(5):613. - PubMed
    1. Qi J, Huesman R. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(8):815. - PubMed
    1. Fessler JA. IEEE Trans Image Processing. 1996;5(3):493. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources