Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):46-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0283-4.

Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education

Affiliations
Review

Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education

Ross J Scalese et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Medical education during the past decade has witnessed a significant increase in the use of simulation technology for teaching and assessment. Contributing factors include: changes in health care delivery and academic environments that limit patient availability as educational opportunities; worldwide attention focused on the problem of medical errors and the need to improve patient safety; and the paradigm shift to outcomes-based education with its requirements for assessment and demonstration of competence. The use of simulators addresses many of these issues: they can be readily available at any time and can reproduce a wide variety of clinical conditions on demand. In lieu of the customary (and arguably unethical) system, whereby novices carry out the practice required to master various techniques--including invasive procedures--on real patients, simulation-based education allows trainees to hone their skills in a risk-free environment. Evaluators can also use simulators for reliable assessments of competence in multiple domains. For those readers less familiar with medical simulators, this article aims to provide a brief overview of these educational innovations and their uses; for decision makers in medical education, we hope to broaden awareness of the significant potential of these new technologies for improving physician training and assessment, with a resultant positive impact on patient safety and health care outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. None
    2. Reznek MA. Current status of simulation in education and research. In: Loyd GE, Lake CL, Greenberg RB, eds. Practical Health Care Simulations. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004:27–47.
    1. None
    2. McGaghie WC. Simulation in professional competence assessment: basic considerations. In: Tekian A, McGuire CH, McGaghie WC, eds. Innovative Simulations for Assessing Professional Competence. Chicago: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1999:7–22.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.282.9.861', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.861'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10478693', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10478693/'}]}
    2. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999;282(9):861–6. - PubMed
    1. None
    2. Fincher R-ME, Lewis LA. Simulations used to teach clinical skills. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:499–535.
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1080/01421599880210', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599880210'}]}
    2. Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 13: real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach 1998;20:508–21.