Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;31(1):7-20.
doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831010-00002.

Benefits and risks of antipsychotic polypharmacy: an evidence-based review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Benefits and risks of antipsychotic polypharmacy: an evidence-based review of the literature

Constantin Tranulis et al. Drug Saf. 2008.

Abstract

Combination antipsychotic prescription is an increasingly common practice in clinical psychiatry. This clinical practice is at odds with clinical guidelines promoting antipsychotic monotherapy. Moreover, there has been increased concern over the safety profile of atypical antipsychotics in the last 10-15 years. We reviewed the literature on antipsychotic combinations with a focus on safety and efficacy. Multiple electronic database searches were complemented by relevant bibliography cross-checking and expert discussions. The review showed a literature that is dominated by case reports and uncontrolled studies. Polypharmacy was unequally studied, with some recent combinations (i.e. clozapine and risperidone) being extensively, albeit inconclusively, studied and other more commonly used combinations (first- with second-generation agents) receiving little attention. From an evidence-based perspective, further trials of antipsychotic association of sufficient power to address safety issues are needed before recommending any antipsychotic combination. Particular weaknesses of the present literature are low number of participants, lack of adequate control of confounding variables, short duration of experimental follow-up and inadequate monitoring of potential adverse effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;39(9):840-1 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;58(2):178-83 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 May;8(5):278-83 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2005 Jan;38(1):39-40 - PubMed
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;159(2):180-90 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources