Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;14(1):5-28.
doi: 10.1177/1077801207311948.

Screening for domestic violence in public welfare offices: an analysis of case manager and client interactions

Affiliations

Screening for domestic violence in public welfare offices: an analysis of case manager and client interactions

Taryn Lindhorst et al. Violence Against Women. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Despite a high prevalence of domestic violence among welfare clients, most studies of the implementation of the Family Violence Option (FVO) under welfare reform find that women rarely receive domestic violence services in welfare offices. This study reviews findings from current research on the factors that improve the likelihood that women will reveal their domestic violence experiences to service personnel, and uses the guidelines drawn from this review to evaluate domestic violence screening practices in welfare offices using 782 transcribed interviews between welfare workers and clients from 11 sites in four states. The analysis found that only 9.3% of case encounters involved screening for domestic violence. Screening rates differed by state, interview type, and length of worker employment. Qualitative analysis of the interviews showed that the majority of screening by workers was routine or consisted of informing clients of the domestic violence policy without asking about abuse. Only 1.2% of the interviews incorporated at least two of the procedures that increase the likelihood of disclosure among domestic violence survivors, suggesting deeply inadequate approaches to screening for abuse within the context of welfare offices, and a need for improved training, protocol, and monitoring of FVO implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening and Identification of Domestic Violence in Four States Note: Cases weighted to be representative of direct service contact.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allard MA, Albelda R, Colten ME, Cosenza C. In harm’s way? Domestic violence, AFDC receipt and welfare reform in Massachusetts. Boston: University of Massachusetts, Boston, Center for Survey Research; 1997.
    1. Ambuel B, Hamberger LK, Lahti JL. The family peace project: A model for training health care professionals to identify, treat and prevent partner violence. In: Hamberger LK, Burge S, Graham A, Costa A, editors. Violence issues for health care educators and providers. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press; 1997. pp. 55–81.
    1. American Medical Association. Policy statement on family and intimate partner violence, H-515.965. Chicago: Author; 2003.
    1. Beach WA, Easter DW, Good JS, Pigeron E. Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews. Social Science & Medicine. 2005;60:893–910. - PubMed
    1. Bergman LR, El-Kouri BM. SLEIPNER. A statistical package for pattern-oriented analyses (Version 2.0) [computer software] Stockholm, UK: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology; 1998.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources