Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec;17(6):524-7.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318150e590.

Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?

Jeroen Diks et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Manipulation of sutures during endoscopic surgery could lead to damage of suture structure, supposedly resulting in loss of strength. Lack of tactile feedback in robotic surgical systems might increase this problem. The objective of this study is to evaluate suture strength after robotic manipulation and to determine which suture material is least susceptible to damage from robotic manipulation.

Methods: The da Vinci surgical system was used to manipulate sutures. Three different suture materials (Prolene, ePTFE, Ethibond) of 3 different sizes (3-0, 4-0, and 5-0) were tested. A total of 270 sutures were pulled on a Servohydraulic Universal Testing Machine. The frequency of breaks at a manipulation-point and the maximum applied force (N) before the suture broke were used for statistic analysis.

Results: No loss in strength was shown in the ePTFE sutures after manipulation, whereas both Prolene and Ethibond sutures showed a significant loss of strength.

Conclusions: ePTFE sutures are least susceptible to robotic manipulations and are, therefore, to be considered as a material of first choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources