Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;30(5):559-66.
doi: 10.1002/hed.20738.

Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy

Jan S Lewin  1 , Katherine A Hutcheson, Denise A Barringer, Annette H May, Dianna B Roberts, F Christopher Holsinger, Eduardo M Diaz Jr
Affiliations

Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy

Jan S Lewin et al. Head Neck. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: In this study, we analyzed swallowing recovery after supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients treated with SCPL (September 1997 to March 2005). We evaluated recovery course, nutritional outcomes, and swallowing using objective analysis. Modified barium swallow (MBS) study results identified swallowing physiology and therapeutic effectiveness.

Results: Average length of hospitalization was 7.7+/-9.2 days; time to decannulation was 5.3+/-8.2 weeks. The most common complications included pneumonia and subcutaneous emphysema (26%). Twenty-two patients had MBS studies, in which initially, all patients aspirated due to neoglottic incompetency, and impaired base of tongue and laryngeal movements. Although aspiration rates did not change significantly over time, use of appropriately selected swallowing strategies effectively protected the airway (p= .0365). Ultimately, 81% of patients returned to complete oral intake with median tube removal at 9.4 weeks.

Conclusion: SCPL produces severe dysphagia initially. Our findings suggest that objective swallowing assessment is important for return to oral nutrition after SCPL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dysphagia symptoms and physiologic findings during MBS studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Swallowing strategies recommended during MBS evaluations
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rates of aspiration and the effectiveness of swallowing strategies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kotz T, Costello R, Li Y, Posner MR. Swallowing dysfunction after chemoradiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2004;26:365–72. - PubMed
    1. Mittal BB, Pauloski BR, Haraf DJ. Swallowing dysfunction—preventative and rehabilitation strategies in patients with head-and-neck cancers treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy: a critical review. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2003;57:1219–30. - PubMed
    1. DeSanto LW, Olsen KD, Perry WC, Rohe DE, et al. Quality of life after surgical treatment of cancer of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995;104:763–769. - PubMed
    1. Lefebvre JL, Lartigau E. Preservation of form and function during management of cancer of the larynx and hypopharynx. World J Surg. 2003;27:811–816. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O, Ruiz C. Larynx preservation with supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:1–7. - PubMed

MeSH terms