Melanocytic naevi, melanoma and sun exposure
- PMID: 1814137
Melanocytic naevi, melanoma and sun exposure
Abstract
The naevus profile was examined in 379 randomly selected Swedes (30-50 years) and in 121 melanoma patients in the same age-range selected from the Regional Cancer Register. The total body count of common naevi (CN) greater than or equal to 2 mm in the population was high (mean 67, range 1-300). Even so, the melanoma patients had almost twice as many CN as the controls (mean 113, range 13-347). The prevalence of clinical dysplastic naevi (DN) was 18% in the population and 56% in the patients. The corresponding figures for histologically diagnosed DN were 8% and 40% respectively. Subjects with dysplastic naevi had a significantly larger number of CN than those without DN. Subjects with a sun-sensitive skin, greater than or equal to 150 naevi and presence of DN had a 50 times higher melanoma risk than those without these characteristics. For identifying subjects at risk of developing cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), clinically diagnosed DN was as good a discriminator as histologically diagnosed DN. The numbers of naevi in different skin areas were tested for their power in predicting the total body naevus count. The strongest correlations were found between total counts and counts on the anterior surface of the thighs and the lateral aspect of the arms. Counts from either of these areas will provide a practical and satisfactory estimate of the total number of naevi. To study the possible link between sun exposure, naevus formation and melanoma development, the distribution of CN, DN and CMM over the body surface was studied in the 121 melanoma patients and in 310 consecutive controls. The number of naevi was four times as high in a sun-exposed area on the lower back compared with in an adjacent sun-protected area on the buttocks, indicating that sunlight plays a role in naevus development. Both CN and CMM were found to have a general distribution pattern over the body surface consistent with the idea that sun exposure is important for their formation. The number of CN and CMM per unit body surface area was significantly higher in intermittently sun-exposed than in rarely or chronically exposed skin. The distribution pattern of DN was quite different from that of CN, with few DN on the sun-exposed upper chest and face and many DN in protected areas such as the buttocks and lower abdomen, indicating that DN may develop independently of sun exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Melanocytic naevi in sun-exposed and protected skin in melanoma patients and controls.Acta Derm Venereol. 1991;71(6):512-7. Acta Derm Venereol. 1991. PMID: 1685834
-
Common and dysplastic naevi as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma in a Swedish population.Acta Derm Venereol. 1991;71(6):518-24. Acta Derm Venereol. 1991. PMID: 1685835
-
Melanocytes, moles and melanoma--a study on UV effects.Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1991;168:1-31. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1991. PMID: 1814138
-
[The sun and malignant melanoma].Hautarzt. 1992 May;43(5):251-7. Hautarzt. 1992. PMID: 1612913 Review. German.
-
[Risk factors for skin melanoma: genetic factors probably more important than exposure to sunlight].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Nov 13;148(46):2267-72. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004. PMID: 15584541 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Risk Prediction Models for Melanoma: A Systematic Review on the Heterogeneity in Model Development and Validation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;17(21):7919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217919. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33126677 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to Evaluate Melanoma Prediction Studies.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;14(12):3033. doi: 10.3390/cancers14123033. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740698 Free PMC article.
-
Sun exposure, pigmentary traits, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a case-control study in a Mediterranean population.Cancer Causes Control. 1996 Mar;7(2):275-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00051303. Cancer Causes Control. 1996. PMID: 8740740
-
Inter-Rater Agreement in Assessing Risk of Bias in Melanoma Prediction Studies Using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST): Results from a Controlled Experiment on the Effect of Specific Rater Training.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1976. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051976. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902763 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic analysis of ultraviolet radiation-induced skin hyperplasia and neoplasia in a laboratory marsupial model (Monodelphis domestica).Arch Dermatol Res. 1994;286(1):12-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00375837. Arch Dermatol Res. 1994. PMID: 8141607
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical