This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):1-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.008.

Potency ratios for local anesthetics in regional blocks: how long must we wait?

John F Butterworth 4th

PMID: 18155049
DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.008

Editorial

Potency ratios for local anesthetics in regional blocks: how long must we wait?

John F Butterworth 4th. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jan-Feb.

. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):1-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.008.

Author

John F Butterworth 4th

PMID: 18155049
DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.008

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Measuring the relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia.
Wildsmith JA, Selander DE. Wildsmith JA, et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):73-4; author reply 734-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181933f63. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009. PMID: 19258992 No abstract available.

Comment on

Median effective local anesthetic doses of plain bupivacaine and ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia administered via a spinal catheter for brachytherapy of the lower abdomen.
Michalek-Sauberer A, Kozek-Langenecker SA, Heinzl H, Deusch E, Chiari A. Michalek-Sauberer A, et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.06.396. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008. PMID: 18155050 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources