Re: Letter to the editor on "Bias in clinical intervention research"
- PMID: 18156601
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm372
Re: Letter to the editor on "Bias in clinical intervention research"
Comment on
-
Re: "Bias in clinical intervention research".Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 15;165(10):1219; author reply 1219-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm081. Epub 2007 Apr 9. Am J Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17426041 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based medicine and acupuncture: old bias for new perspectives in clinical context.J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1035-7. doi: 10.1111/jep.12435. Epub 2015 Aug 16. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015. PMID: 26277999 No abstract available.
-
Good publishing practice.J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;65(4):353-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.005. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22360986 No abstract available.
-
[Clinical intervention research: two editorials and one discussion].Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 May 23;167(21):2307-8; author reply 2308-10. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005. PMID: 15962866 Danish. No abstract available.
-
Bias in surgical research.Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf4b. Ann Surg. 2008. PMID: 18650626 Review.
-
Epidemiologic considerations in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss.Occup Med. 1995 Jul-Aug;10(3):641-56. Occup Med. 1995. PMID: 8578424 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical