Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia
- PMID: 18158077
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.002
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia
Abstract
Background: Although previous studies have examined the efficacy of pitavastatin, its tolerability and effects on lipid concentrations have not been compared with those of atorvastatin in a multicenter, randomized study.
Objective: This trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults.
Methods: This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study was conducted at 18 clinical centers in Korea between May 2005 and February 2006. After a 4-week dietary lead-in period, patients with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Patients who had not reached the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal by week 4 received a double dose of the assigned medication for an additional 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of achievement of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals and changes from baseline in other lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The tolerability profile was assessed by physical and electro-cardiographic examinations, laboratory tests, and recording adverse reactions at all visits.
Results: A total of 268 patients were randomized to treatment, and 222 (82.8%) completed the study (149 women, 73 men; mean age, 59 years; mean weight, 63.5 kg). At the end of the study, there was no significant difference between the pitavastatin and atorvastatin groups in the proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C goal (92.7% [102/110] vs 92.0% [103/112], respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of the percent changes from baseline in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or hs-CRP. Twenty-six of 136 patients (19.1%) taking pitavastatin reported 35 treatment-emergent adverse reactions; 33 of 132 patients (25.0%) taking atorvastatin reported 39 treatment-emergent adverse reactions. Elevations in creatine kinase were observed in 6 patients (4.4%) in the pitavastatin group and 7 patients (5.3%) in the atorvastatin group. There were no serious adverse drug reactions in either group.
Conclusions: In these adult Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia, pitavastatin and atorvastatin did not differ significantly in terms of the proportions of patients achieving the LDL-C goal; reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and triglycerides; or increases in HDL-C. Both drugs were well tolerated.
Similar articles
-
A 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of the tolerability and effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and glucose metabolism in Japanese patients with elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose intolerance.Clin Ther. 2008 Jun;30(6):1089-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.017. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18640465 Clinical Trial.
-
Twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label comparison of the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg/d and atorvastatin 10 mg/d in high-risk adults: a DISCOVERY study.Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1821-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.015. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15639694 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of low-dose pitavastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):415-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M522. Epub 2010 Feb 23. Ann Pharmacother. 2010. PMID: 20179259 Clinical Trial.
-
Are all statins the same? Focus on the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011;11(2):93-107. doi: 10.2165/11591190-000000000-00000. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21446776 Review.
-
New evidence on pitavastatin: efficacy and safety in clinical studies.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Apr;11(5):817-28. doi: 10.1517/14656561003641990. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010. PMID: 20201733 Review.
Cited by
-
Pitavastatin for lowering lipids.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 19;6(6):CD012735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012735.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32557581 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Small Molecules Containing Fluorine Atoms in Medicine and Imaging Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;17(3):281. doi: 10.3390/ph17030281. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38543068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Review on Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Pitavastatin in Dyslipidemia in Asia.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;13(1):59. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010059. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39791666 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pitavastatin: a review of its use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia.Drugs. 2012 Mar 5;72(4):565-84. doi: 10.2165/11207180-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22356292 Review.
-
Pitavastatin Compared with Differential Intervention Trial by Standard Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Dyslipidemia on Chronic Hemodialysis (DIALYSIS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.Blood Purif. 2023;52(5):483-492. doi: 10.1159/000528763. Epub 2023 Jan 30. Blood Purif. 2023. PMID: 36716708 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous