Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;64(3):695-701.
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00949.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

Bounds on direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables

Zhihong Cai  1 , Manabu Kuroki  2 , Judea Pearl  3 , Jin Tian  4
Affiliations
Free article

Bounds on direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables

Zhihong Cai et al. Biometrics. 2008 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

This article considers the problem of estimating the average controlled direct effect (ACDE) of a treatment on an outcome, in the presence of unmeasured confounders between an intermediate variable and the outcome. Such confounders render the direct effect unidentifiable even in cases where the total effect is unconfounded (hence identifiable). Kaufman et al. (2005, Statistics in Medicine 24, 1683-1702) applied a linear programming software to find the minimum and maximum possible values of the ACDE for specific numerical data. In this article, we apply the symbolic Balke-Pearl (1997, Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 1171-1176) linear programming method to derive closed-form formulas for the upper and lower bounds on the ACDE under various assumptions of monotonicity. These universal bounds enable clinical experimenters to assess the direct effect of treatment from observed data with minimum computational effort, and they further shed light on the sign of the direct effect and the accuracy of the assessments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Balke, A. (1995). Probabilistic counterfactuals: Semantics, computation, and applications. Technical Report (R-242), UCLA Cognitive Systems Laboratory (Ph.D. Thesis).
    1. Balke, A. and Pearl, J. (1997). Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 1171-1176.
    1. Buyse, M. and Molenberghs, G. (1998). Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments. Biometrics 54, 1014-1029.
    1. Freedman, L. S., Graubard, B. I., and Schatzkin, A. (1992). Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Statistics in Medicine 11, 167-178.
    1. Greenland, S. and Robins, J. M. (1986). Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. International Journal of Epidemiology 15, 413-419.

Publication types

MeSH terms