Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial
- PMID: 18163521
- DOI: 10.1002/art.23144
Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus oral administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: MTX-naive patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints >or= 4) were eligible for the study if they had not previously taken biologic agents and had not taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for 2 weeks prior to randomization. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/week of MTX either orally (2 7.5-mg tablets plus a dummy prefilled syringe; n=187 patients) or SC (prefilled syringe containing 10 mg/ml plus 2 dummy tablets; n=188 patients) for 24 weeks. At week 16, patients who did not meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) were switched from 15 mg of oral MTX to 15 mg of SC MTX and from 15 mg of SC MTX to 20 mg of SC MTX for the remaining 8 weeks, still in a blinded manner. The primary outcome was an ACR20 response at 24 weeks.
Results: At week 24, significantly more patients treated with SC MTX than with oral MTX showed ACR20 (78% versus 70%) and ACR70 (41% versus 33%) responses. Patients with a disease duration >or= 12 months had even higher ACR20 response rates (89% for SC administration and 63% for oral). In 52 of the ACR20 nonresponders (14%), treatment was switched at week 16. Changing from oral to SC MTX and from 15 mg to 20 mg of SC MTX resulted in 30% and 23% ACR20 response rates, respectively, in these patients. MTX was well tolerated. The rate of adverse events was similar in all groups.
Conclusion: This 6-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial is the first to examine oral versus SC administration of MTX. We found that SC administration was significantly more effective than oral administration of the same MTX dosage. There was no difference in tolerability.
Comment in
-
Oral versus parenteral administration of methotrexate for the treatment of active RA.Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Jul;4(7):342-3. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0827. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008. PMID: 18521111 No abstract available.
-
Limitations of the study of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Braun et al.Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul;58(7):2209; author reply 2209-10. doi: 10.1002/art.23615. Arthritis Rheum. 2008. PMID: 18576338 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment.Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):26-37. doi: 10.1002/art.21519. Arthritis Rheum. 2006. PMID: 16385520 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial.Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1390-400. doi: 10.1002/art.21778. Arthritis Rheum. 2006. PMID: 16649186 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in combination with methotrexate: results of a twenty-four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):614-24. doi: 10.1002/art.10141. Arthritis Rheum. 2002. PMID: 11920396 Clinical Trial.
-
Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration.Adv Ther. 2016 Mar;33(3):369-78. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0295-8. Epub 2016 Feb 4. Adv Ther. 2016. PMID: 26846283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Golimumab: Review of the efficacy and tolerability of a recently approved tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor.Clin Ther. 2010 Sep;32(10):1681-703. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.09.003. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 21194591 Review.
Cited by
-
Overview of Methotrexate Toxicity: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Cureus. 2022 Sep 23;14(9):e29518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29518. eCollection 2022 Sep. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36312688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Update on subcutaneous methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jan 9;14:105-116. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S154745. eCollection 2018. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018. PMID: 29386902 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Methotrexate treatment before use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis : Analysis of guideline compliance].Z Rheumatol. 2023 Sep;82(7):573-579. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-01086-0. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Z Rheumatol. 2023. PMID: 34545429 Free PMC article. German.
-
Comparing Healthcare Costs Associated with Oral and Subcutaneous Methotrexate or Biologic Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States.Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Feb;10(1):42-49. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017. PMID: 28465768 Free PMC article.
-
What is the future of targeted therapy in rheumatology: biologics or small molecules?BMC Med. 2014 Mar 13;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-43. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 24620738 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical