Similar articles

• Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.

  Ortashi O, Jain S, Emannuel O, Henry R, Wood A, Evans J. Ortashi O, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Apr;137(2):232-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.029. Epub 2007 May 29. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008. PMID: 17537566
• MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.

  Hori M, Kim T, Murakami T, Imaoka I, Onishi H, Nakamoto A, Nakaya Y, Tomoda K, Tsutsui T, Enomoto T, Kimura T, Nakamura H. Hori M, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Sep;30(3):621-30. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21879. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19711413 Clinical Trial.
• The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative deep myometrium assessment in endometrial cancer.

  Wu WJ, Yu MS, Su HY, Lin KS, Lu KL, Hwang KS. Wu WJ, et al. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;52(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.04.010. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23915853
• MR staging of endometrial carcinoma.

  Messiou C, Spencer JA, Swift SE. Messiou C, et al. Clin Radiol. 2006 Oct;61(10):822-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.05.008. Clin Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16978977 Review.
• [Endometrial cancer imaging].

  Taïeb S, Rocourt N, Narducci F, Ceugnart L. Taïeb S, et al. Bull Cancer. 2012 Jan;99(1):13-20. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1500. Bull Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22134048 Review. French.