Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Mar;77(3):247-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006. Epub 2007 Nov 17.

Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings

Affiliations
Review

Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings

Jonas K Olofsson et al. Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

The review summarizes and integrates findings from 40 years of event-related potential (ERP) studies using pictures that differ in valence (unpleasant-to-pleasant) and arousal (low-to-high) and that are used to elicit emotional processing. Affective stimulus factors primarily modulate ERP component amplitude, with little change in peak latency observed. Arousal effects are consistently obtained, and generally occur at longer latencies. Valence effects are inconsistently reported at several latency ranges, including very early components. Some affective ERP modulations vary with recording methodology, stimulus factors, as well as task-relevance and emotional state. Affective ERPs have been linked theoretically to attention orientation for unpleasant pictures at earlier components (<300 ms). Enhanced stimulus processing has been associated with memory encoding for arousing pictures of assumed intrinsic motivational relevance, with task-induced differences contributing to emotional reactivity at later components (>300 ms). Theoretical issues, stimulus factors, task demands, and individual differences are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean of female and male ratings of the arousal (low to high) and valence (unpleasant to pleasant) values from a 1-9 scale for each stimulus image from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS).

References

    1. Amrhein C, Muhlberger A, Pauli P, Wiedemann G. Modulation of event-related brain potentials during affective picture processing: a complement to startle reflex and skin conductance response? International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2004;54:231–240. - PubMed
    1. Azizian A, Polich J. Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007 in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batty M, Taylor MJ. Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;17:613–620. - PubMed
    1. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2000;10:295–307. - PubMed
    1. Bentin S, Mccarthy G. The effects of immediate stimulus repetition on reaction-time and event-related potentials in tasks of different complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1994;20:130–149.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources