Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements
- PMID: 18165089
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013
Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements
Abstract
Purpose: To comprehensively assess the reliability of automated Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.) measurements.
Setting: Flinders Eye Centre, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Methods: Both eyes of 35 normal volunteers were tested twice on the same day by 2 different observers. All automated values were recorded, and manual analysis of topographic maps was performed only to overrule variance in corneal thickness due to pupil decentration altering the central reference point. Repeatability was determined with Bland-Altman limits of agreement and reported as the coefficient of repeatability (COR = +/-1.96 standard deviation of differences). Relative repeatability (RR) was calculated as a percentage of the ratio of COR to the mean.
Results: Overall, repeatability was good. Corneal curvature, reported in diopters, showed good repeatability anteriorly (simulated keratometry mean COR+/-0.28D; RR=0.64%) and posteriorly (COR+/-011D; RR=1.85%). Peripheral corneal curvature was more reliable when calculated by the sagittal (axial) method (RR=1.57%) than by the tangential (meridional) method (RR=2.38%). Keratometric power deviation was less reliable (RR=16.39%). Anterior chamber measurements showed good reliability (RR=3.07%-5.68%) except for anterior chamber angle (RR=14.41%). Pupil diameter showed poor reliability (RR=25.77%). Central corneal thickness was comparable at pupil center and corneal vertex, but peripheral repeatability was much better when centered on the corneal vertex (COR+/-16.00microm; RR=2.56%) than at pupil center (COR+/-26.28microm; RR=4.23%).
Conclusions: Pentacam corneal curvature and anterior chamber parameters were highly repeatable, but pupil measurements had poor repeatability. Peripheral pachymetry readings were affected by pupil decentration and required manual analysis using the corneal vertex as the point of reference to achieve good repeatability.
Similar articles
-
Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.056. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 18471625
-
Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.010. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. PMID: 19101433
-
A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 29;52(10):7731-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7093. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21810981
-
Anterior segment biometry: a study and review of resolution and repeatability data.J Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;28(7):509-20. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120620-02. J Refract Surg. 2012. PMID: 22767168 Review.
-
Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;18(4):325-33. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281ca7121. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17568210 Review.
Cited by
-
Which keratometer is most reliable for correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses?Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;26(1):10-4. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10. Epub 2012 Jan 14. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22323879 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045607. Epub 2012 Sep 25. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23049823 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Static and Dynamic Pupil Characteristics in Myopic Anisometropic Amblyopia.Beyoglu Eye J. 2020 Jul 29;5(2):86-92. doi: 10.14744/bej.2020.08760. eCollection 2020. Beyoglu Eye J. 2020. PMID: 35098069 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement between Keratometric readings by VERION image guided System, Galilei G4 and Pentacam.Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):740-743. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14577. Pak J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30034450 Free PMC article.
-
Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly?Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May;92(3):173-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00367.x. Clin Exp Optom. 2009. PMID: 19453557 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources