Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan;10(1):13-27.
doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070082. Epub 2007 Dec 28.

Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer

Shuji Ogino et al. J Mol Diagn. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Molecular classification of colorectal cancer is evolving. As our understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis improves, we are incorporating new knowledge into the classification system. In particular, global genomic status [microsatellite instability (MSI) status and chromosomal instability (CIN) status] and epigenomic status [CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status] play a significant role in determining clinical, pathological and biological characteristics of colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss molecular classification and molecular correlates based on MSI status and CIMP status in colorectal cancer. Studying molecular correlates is important in cancer research because it can 1) provide clues to pathogenesis, 2) propose or support the existence of a new molecular subtype, 3) alert investigators to be aware of potential confounding factors in association studies, and 4) suggest surrogate markers in clinical or research settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CIMP classification in colorectal cancer and associations with clinical and molecular features.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The six groups of colorectal cancer according to MSI and CIMP status.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The four major subtypes of colorectal cancer according to MSI and CIMP status.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A: Frequency of BRAF mutation in the four major subtypes of colorectal cancer (data in Ref.86). B: Frequency of p53 positivity (by immunohistochemistry) in the four major subtypes of colorectal cancer (data in Ref.76). C: Frequencies of CIMP-high and MSI-H in colorectal cancer according to combined p53 and p21 (CDKN1A) status (data in Ref.75).
Figure 5
Figure 5
A: Molecular correlates in colorectal cancer. Note that MSI and CIMP (in the blue circle) are present centrally in this figure of the molecular correlates, implying their influence on various molecular alterations (indicated as “p53,” “p21,” etc) and a phenotype in colorectal cancer. B: Molecular correlates in colorectal cancer in the past (particularly without our current knowledge on CIMP and BRAF mutation). This figure is much simpler than A.

References

    1. Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S. In: Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum. Aaltonen LA, Hamilton SR, editors. IARC Press; Lyon, France: 2000.
    1. Redston M. Carcinogenesis in the GI tract: from morphology to genetics and back again. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:236–245. - PubMed
    1. Compton CC. Colorectal carcinoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and molecular features. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:376–388. - PubMed
    1. Bagg A, Kallakury BV. Molecular pathology of leukemia and lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;112:S76–S92. - PubMed
    1. Arber DA. Molecular diagnostic approach to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Mol Diagn. 2000;2:178–190. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances