Sterilization
- PMID: 18165410
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000298621.98372.62
Sterilization
Erratum in
- Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):989
Abstract
Worldwide, sterilization (tubal sterilization and vasectomy) is used by more people than any other method of contraception. All techniques of tubal sterilization in widespread use in the United States have low risks of surgical complications. Although tubal sterilization is highly effective, the risk of pregnancy varies by age and method of occlusion. Pregnancies can occur many years after the procedure, and when they do, the risk of ectopic gestation is high. There is now strong evidence against the existence of a post-tubal ligation syndrome of menstrual abnormalities. Although women who have undergone tubal sterilization are more likely than other women to undergo hysterectomy subsequently, there is no known biologic basis for this relationship. Although sterilization is intended to be permanent, expressions of regret and requests for reversal are not uncommon and are much more likely to occur among women sterilized at young ages. Tubal sterilization has little or no effect on sexual function for most women. Vasectomy is less likely than tubal sterilization to result in serious complications. Minor complications, however, are not uncommon. Vasectomy does not increase the risk of heart disease, and available evidence argues against an increase in the risk of prostate cancer, testicular cancer, or overall mortality. Whether a postvasectomy pain syndrome exists remains controversial. Although the long-term effectiveness of vasectomy is less well-studied than that for tubal sterilization, it seems likely to be at least as effective. Intrauterine devices and progestin implants are long-acting, highly effective alternatives to sterilization.
Similar articles
-
Sterilization.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):603-40. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6239731 Review.
-
Contraceptive sterilization: trends, options, and surprising new data.Dialogues Contracept. 1997 Spring;5(2):5-7. Dialogues Contracept. 1997. PMID: 12292544
-
The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 7;343(23):1681-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012073432303. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 11106717
-
Sterilization a popular, effective method of birth control.Contracept Technol Update. 1990 Apr;11(4):55-7. Contracept Technol Update. 1990. PMID: 12316252
-
Sterilization.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Aug;3(4):501-9. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1878508 Review.
Cited by
-
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(4):1-126. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106314 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine fluid instillation to confirm tubal occlusion after transcervical permanent contraception: A pilot study.Contraception. 2020 Jan;101(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 31655066 Free PMC article.
-
The right to informed choice. A study and opinion poll of women who were or were not given the option of a sterilisation with their caesarean section.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 22;6(3):e14776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014776. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21445338 Free PMC article.
-
Urban-Rural Differences in Tubal Ligation Incidence in the State of Georgia, USA.J Rural Health. 2018 Mar;34(2):122-131. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12259. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Rural Health. 2018. PMID: 28731204 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization.South Med J. 2018 Mar;111(3):173-177. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000779. South Med J. 2018. PMID: 29505655 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical