Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar;17(2):291-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9302-5. Epub 2007 Dec 29.

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in anemic heart failure patients

Affiliations

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in anemic heart failure patients

John A Spertus et al. Qual Life Res. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Background: While generic health status measures quantify the impact of all patients' diseases on their health-related quality of life, disease specific measures focus on only one of the many conditions that a patient may have. If a patient has two diseases with similar clinical manifestations, they may respond differently to a disease-specific instrument if one of their conditions improves while the other worsens or remains stable, thus undermining the instruments in that patient population. We sought empirical evidence of the reliability and validity (including responsiveness) of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a disease-specific measure for heart failure (HF), among HF patients with and without anemia, a condition that has similar symptoms to HF.

Methods: This work used a prospective cohort study of 811 HF outpatients from 58 U.S. centers with a baseline assessment of anemia of whom 698 were followed for 3 months with serial health status measures.

Results: Among participants, 268 (33%) were anemic. The construct validity of the KCCQ was supported by showing similar correlations with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification in patients with and without anemia (P value for interaction = 0.38). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92 and 0.93 for anemic and non-anemic patients, respectively) and test-retest reliability (mean 3-month change scores in stable patients = -2.8 [SD = 1.4] and -0.5 [SD = 0.8], P = 0.14) were similar. Estimates of responsiveness were also similar.

Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence that the psychometric properties of the KCCQ are similar in patients with or without anemia, a potentially confounding clinical condition in patients with heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
KCCQ overall summary score by NYHA class in anemic and nonanemic patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three-month KCCQ change by reported health change and anemia status

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.04.002', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.04.002'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15948091', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15948091/'}]}
    2. Normand, S. L., Rector, T. S., Neaton, J. D., Pina, I. L., Lazar, R. M., Proestel, S. E., Fleischer, D. J., Cohn, J. N. & Spertus, J. A. (2005). Clinical and analytical considerations in the study of health status in device trials for heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 11, 396–403. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1067/mhj.2001.119135', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.119135'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11685157', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11685157/'}]}
    2. Spertus, J. (2001). Selecting end points in clinical trials: What evidence do we really need to evaluate a new treatment? American Heart Journal, 142, 745–747. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.022', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.022'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16168273', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16168273/'}]}
    2. Hunt, S. A. (2005). ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 46, e1–e82. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10736296', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10736296/'}]}
    2. Quality of Care, Outcomes Research in CVD and Stroke Working Group (2000). Measuring and improving quality of care: A report from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology first scientific forum on assessment of healthcare quality in cardiovascular disease and stroke. Circulation, 101, 1483–1493. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10736303', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10736303/'}]}
    2. Krumholz, H. M., Baker, D. W., Ashton, C. M., Dunbar, S. B., Friesinger, G. C., Havranek, E. P., Hlatky, M. A., Konstam, M., Ordin, D. L., Pina, I. L., Pitt, B. & Spertus, J. A. (2000). Evaluating quality of care for patients with heart failure. Circulation, 101, E122–E140. - PubMed

Publication types