Show me the data
- PMID: 18166622
- PMCID: PMC2174163
- DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200709940
Show me the data
Comment in
-
Irreproducible results--a response to Thomson Scientific.J Gen Physiol. 2008 Feb;131(2):183-4. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200809957. J Gen Physiol. 2008. PMID: 18227275 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
These are our rules. An updated code of ethics for Modern Nealthcare's editorial staff.Mod Healthc. 2006 Oct 30;36(43):17. Mod Healthc. 2006. PMID: 17128584 No abstract available.
-
Caveat emptor: the corruption of open access scientific publishing.Med J Aust. 2014 Apr 21;200(7):386-8. doi: 10.5694/mja13.00082. Med J Aust. 2014. PMID: 24794662 No abstract available.
-
Self-plagiarism.Anaesthesia. 2011 Mar;66(3):220-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06645.x. Anaesthesia. 2011. PMID: 21320090 No abstract available.
-
Issues and rules for authors concerning authorship versus acknowledgements, dual publication, self plagiarism, and salami publishing.Res Nurs Health. 2008 Aug;31(4):295-7. doi: 10.1002/nur.20280. Res Nurs Health. 2008. PMID: 18324682 Review. No abstract available.
-
Successful publishing: how to get your paper accepted.Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;18(4):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 11. Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18849161 Review.
Cited by
-
The social media index: measuring the impact of emergency medicine and critical care websites.West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):242-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24860. Epub 2015 Mar 17. West J Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25834664 Free PMC article.
-
Whole-cell patch-clamp recording and parameters.Biophys Rev. 2023 Apr 10;15(2):257-288. doi: 10.1007/s12551-023-01055-8. eCollection 2023 Apr. Biophys Rev. 2023. PMID: 37124922 Free PMC article.
-
Irreproducible results--a response to Thomson Scientific.J Gen Physiol. 2008 Feb;131(2):183-4. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200809957. J Gen Physiol. 2008. PMID: 18227275 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12.
-
- Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003–1004. 10.1038/4351003a. - DOI