The QRISK was less likely to overestimate cardiovascular risk than the Framingham or ASSIGN equations
- PMID: 18171012
The QRISK was less likely to overestimate cardiovascular risk than the Framingham or ASSIGN equations
Comment on
-
Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):136. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39261.471806.55. Epub 2007 Jul 5. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17615182 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular Risk and Risk Scores: ASSIGN, Framingham, QRISK and others: how to choose.Heart. 2011 Mar;97(6):442-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.214858. Heart. 2011. PMID: 21339319 No abstract available.
-
Evaluating Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk scores for participants with known CVD and non-CVD in a multiracial/ethnic Caribbean sample.PeerJ. 2020 Mar 9;8:e8232. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8232. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32195041 Free PMC article.
-
QRISK underestimated risk of cardiovascular disease in general practice patients; Framingham score overestimated risk.Evid Based Nurs. 2008 Jul;11(3):91. doi: 10.1136/ebn.11.3.91. Evid Based Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18583503 No abstract available.
-
[Cardiovascular risk factors. Insights from Framingham Heart Study].Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):299-310. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18361904 Review. Spanish.
-
Updating the assessment of cardiac risk: beyond Framingham.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Spring;10(2):63-71. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2009. PMID: 19593318 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular/stroke risk predictive calculators: a comparison between statistical and machine learning models.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Aug;10(4):919-938. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.07. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020. PMID: 32968651 Free PMC article.