Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;98(2):216-21.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777. Epub 2008 Jan 2.

Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations

Affiliations

Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations

Katherine L Frohlich et al. Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Using the concept of vulnerable populations, we examine how disparities in health may be exacerbated by population-approach interventions. We show, from an etiologic perspective, how life-course epidemiology, the concentration of risk factors, and the concept of fundamental causes of diseases may explain the differential capacity, throughout the risk-exposure distribution, to transform resources provided through population-approach interventions into health. From an intervention perspective, we argue that population-approach interventions may be compromised by inconsistencies between the social and cultural assumptions of public health practitioners and targeted groups. We propose some intervention principles to mitigate the health disparities associated with population-approach interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Hypothetical homogenous effect of a population-approach intervention on the distribution of risk in a population. Note. Arrows indicate where the lines of the distribution would be after a population-level approach.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Illustration of a potential increase in the variation of risk following a population-approach intervention. Source. Adapted from Rose.(p74) …Note. Arrows depict the shifting of the curve after a population-level approach. Circles indcate where the variation in risk is most flagrant.

Comment in

  • Intervening on high-risk or vulnerable populations?
    Semenza JC, Suk J, Manissero D. Semenza JC, et al. Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1351-2; author reply 1352. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.141036. Epub 2008 Jun 12. Am J Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18556594 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Detels R, Breslow L. Current scope and concerns in public health. In: Detels R, McEwen J, Beaglehole R, Tanaka H, eds. The Scope of Public Health. 4th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002:3–20. Oxford Textbook of Public Health; vol 1.
    1. Goel V. Socioeconomic status and cancer incidence and survival. Cancer Prev Control. 1998;2:211–212. - PubMed
    1. Choinière R, Lafontaine P, Edwards AC. Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk factors by socioeconomic status among Canadian adults. CMAJ. 2001; 162:S13–S24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heymann D. Infectious agents. In: Detels R, McEwen J, Beaglehole R, Tanaka H, eds. The Scope of Public Health. 4th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002:171–194. Oxford Textbook of Public Health; vol 1.
    1. Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians. 1974. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/pubs/1974-lalond.... Accessed October 22, 2007.

Publication types