Clinical comparison of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase-PCR and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for the quantitation of circulating recombinant form_BC HIV-1 RNA in plasma
- PMID: 18172387
- DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000304693.16767.66
Clinical comparison of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase-PCR and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for the quantitation of circulating recombinant form_BC HIV-1 RNA in plasma
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the correlation between three viral load assays for circulating recombinant form (CRF)_BC.
Design: Recent studies in HIV-1 molecular epidemiology, reveals that CRF_BC is the dominant subtype of HIV-1 virus in mainland China, representing over 45% of the HIV-1 infected population. The performances of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), branched DNA (bDNA) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were compared for the HIV-1 viral load detection and quantitation of CRF_BC in China.
Methods: Sixteen HIV-1 positive and three HIV-1 negative samples were collected. Sequencing of the positive samples in the gp41 region was conducted. The HIV-1 viral load values were determined using bDNA, RT-PCR and NASBA assays. Deming regression analysis with SPSS 12.0 (SPS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was performed for data analysis.
Results: Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of env gene (gp41) region of the 16 HIV-1 positive clinical specimens from Guizhou Province in southwest China revealed the dominance of the subtype CRF_BC in that region. A good correlation of their viral load values was observed among three assays. Pearson's correlation between RT-PCR and bDNA is 0.969, Lg(VL)RT-PCR = 0.969 * Lg(VL)bDNA + 0.55; Pearson's correlation between RT-PCR and NASBA is 0.968, Lg(VL)RT-PCR = 0.968 * Lg(VL)NASBA + 0.937; Pearson's correlation between NASBA and bDNA is 0.980, Lg(VL)NASBA = 0.980 * Lg(VL)bDNA - 0.318.
Conclusion: When testing with 3 different assays, RT-PCR, bDNA and NASBA, the group of 16 HIV-1 positive samples showed the viral load value was highest for RT-PCR, followed by bDNA then NASBA, which is consistent with the former results in subtype B. The three viral load assays are highly correlative for CRF_BC in China.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of three assays for the quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma.J Med Virol. 1996 Dec;50(4):293-302. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199612)50:4<293::AID-JMV3>3.0.CO;2-3. J Med Virol. 1996. PMID: 8950685
-
Comparative evaluation of hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation by branched DNA, NASBA, and monitor assays.Hepatology. 1999 Feb;29(2):528-35. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290237. Hepatology. 1999. PMID: 9918931
-
Comprehensive comparison of the VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA) and COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.5 assays on 1,000 clinical specimens.J Clin Virol. 2005 Dec;34(4):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.012. J Clin Virol. 2005. PMID: 16286047
-
Molecular-based methods for quantifying HIV viral load.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004 Feb;18(2):75-9. doi: 10.1089/108729104322802506. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004. PMID: 15006182 Review.
-
Molecular diagnosis of HIV.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002 May;2(3):233-9. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2.3.233. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12050862 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality assurance in the HIV/AIDS laboratory network of China.Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;39 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii72-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq224. Int J Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 21113040 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical