Ocular surface area and human eye blink frequency during VDU work: the effect of monitor position and task
- PMID: 18172669
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0661-y
Ocular surface area and human eye blink frequency during VDU work: the effect of monitor position and task
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the ocular surface area (OSA) and the eye blink frequency (BF) are affected by a high versus a low-monitor position during visual display unit (VDU) work with varying cognitive demands. In a balanced randomized (2 x 2) design ten healthy subjects (five males, five females) completed two different tasks on the VDU in a simulated office environment (23 degrees C and 30-35% relative humidity); an active task with demands on vision and hand-eye coordination, and a passive task. Two monitor positions were used: high (the monitors' upper edge at the same height as the subjects' eyes) and low (lowered by 25 degrees and perpendicular to gaze angle). Each task lasted 10 min. An OSA-proxy was measured from video recordings, and BF was sampled by electrooculography. The effect of lowering the gaze angle by 25 degrees decreased the OSA-proxy significantly (P < 0.01) during the active task, indicating that a low position of the monitor may be preferable even though the BF also decreased. Overall, the OSA-proxy was 6% higher during the active task compared to the passive while BF during the active task was 69% lower than during the passive task. The low BF during the active task was succeded by a burst with high BF after cessation of the active task, indicating a compensatory blinking process. This stresses that interchange of work tasks with different cognitive load is as important as the monitor position in the prevention of visual and musculoskeletal disorders.
Similar articles
-
Eye blink frequency during different computer tasks quantified by electrooculography.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jan;99(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0322-6. Epub 2006 Nov 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17115181
-
Effects of wink glass on blink rate, nibut and ocular surface symptoms during visual display unit use.Curr Eye Res. 2014 Sep;39(9):879-84. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.859273. Epub 2014 Jul 11. Curr Eye Res. 2014. PMID: 25014251
-
Blinking is controlled primarily by ocular surface conditions.Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul;124(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71639-3. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 9222228
-
The influence of eye solutions on blinking and ocular comfort at rest and during work at video display terminals.Exp Eye Res. 1999 Jun;68(6):663-9. doi: 10.1006/exer.1998.0656. Exp Eye Res. 1999. PMID: 10375429 Clinical Trial.
-
Vision: in the blink of an eye.Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):R554-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.007. Curr Biol. 2005. PMID: 16051164 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual and psychological stress during computer work in healthy, young females-physiological responses.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Oct;91(7):811-830. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1324-5. Epub 2018 May 30. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018. PMID: 29850947 Free PMC article.
-
Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;260(4):1183-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05490-9. Epub 2021 Nov 15. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34779906 Free PMC article.
-
Association between tear film break up time and blink interval in visual display terminal users.Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 18;11(10):1691-1697. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.10.18. eCollection 2018. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30364241 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous eyeblink activity under different conditions of gaze (eye position) and visual glare.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;252(7):1147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2673-8. Epub 2014 May 29. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24872023
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous