Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;393(3):413-21.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0261-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Living donor liver resection: a low-tech but highly efficient technique. The Regensburg experience

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Living donor liver resection: a low-tech but highly efficient technique. The Regensburg experience

Aiman Obed et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate a low-tech blunt liver dissecting technique for living-liver-donor procedures. Thirty three adult-to-adult living-donor operations were performed at Regensburg University and Jordan Hospital, Amman.

Patients and methods: For the technique of parenchymal dissection, dissecting scissors were used for blunt preparation; branches were closed, carefully pressing into the hepatic parenchyma. Donor, surgical procedure data, and data on liver function and recovery were analyzed and compared to literature.

Results: Median procedure time was 280 min (210 to 420 min). Median blood loss was 350 ml (0 to 650 ml). GOT levels decreased from 260 U/l (140 to 510 U/l) on day 1 to 65 U/l (31 to 220 U/l) on day 7. Bilirubin levels were at 2.0 mmol/l (1.29 to 5.99 mmol/l) on day 1 and 1.26 mmol/l (0.63 to 4.70 mmol/l) on day 7. After 12 days (6 to 23), all donors were discharged. There was no donor mortality. One major complication (biliary leakage) and seven minor complications occurred.

Conclusion: This technique is a low-tech but efficient donor-dissection technique in living liver transplantation, which is comparable to other well established dissection techniques utilizing technical devices in regards to risk for the donor, performance, and recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):261-9; discussion 269-70 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):1013-24; discussions 1024-6 - PubMed
    1. Transpl Int. 2000;13(5):333-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2000 Jan;231(1):126-31 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 1999 Oct;23(10):1032-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources