Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves
- PMID: 18173506
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03400.x
Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves
Abstract
Mexican and red wolves were both faced with extinction in the wild until captive populations were established more than two decades ago. These captive populations have been successfully managed genetically to minimize mean kinship and retain genetic variation. Descendants of these animals were subsequently used to start reintroduced populations, which now number about 40-50 Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico and about 100 red wolves in North Carolina. The original captive Mexican wolf population was descended from three founders. Merging this lineage with two other captive lineages, each with two founders, has been successfully carried out in the captive population and is in progress in the reintroduced population. This effort has resulted in increased fitness of cross-lineage wolves, or genetic rescue, in both the captive and reintroduced populations. A number of coyote-red wolf hybrid litters were observed in the late 1990s in the reintroduced red wolf population. Intensive identification and management efforts appear to have resulted in the elimination of this threat. However, population reintroductions of both Mexican and red wolves appear to have reached numbers well below the generally recommended number for recovery and there is no current effort to re-establish other populations.
Similar articles
-
The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):252-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03468.x. Epub 2007 Sep 18. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 17877715
-
Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves.Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 22;274(1623):2365-71. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0785. Proc Biol Sci. 2007. PMID: 17609180 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective investigation of captive red wolf reproductive success in relation to age and inbreeding.Zoo Biol. 2009 May;28(3):214-29. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20224. Zoo Biol. 2009. PMID: 19504595
-
Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):325-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03399.x. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 18173504 Review.
-
Developing the science of reintroduction biology.Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):303-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x. Conserv Biol. 2007. PMID: 17391180 Review.
Cited by
-
Population genomics of grey wolves and wolf-like canids in North America.PLoS Genet. 2018 Nov 12;14(11):e1007745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007745. eCollection 2018 Nov. PLoS Genet. 2018. PMID: 30419012 Free PMC article.
-
Genetics and wolf conservation in the American West: lessons and challenges.Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Jul;107(1):16-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.147. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Heredity (Edinb). 2011. PMID: 21119704 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Giant pandas in captivity undergo short-term adaptation in nerve-related pathways.BMC Zool. 2024 Feb 21;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40850-024-00195-y. BMC Zool. 2024. PMID: 38383502 Free PMC article.
-
Conservation genetics as applied evolution: from genetic pattern to evolutionary process.Evol Appl. 2008 Feb;1(1):84-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00008.x. Evol Appl. 2008. PMID: 25567493 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic management on the brink of extinction: sequencing microsatellites does not improve estimates of inbreeding in wild and captive Vancouver Island marmots (Marmota vancouverensis).Conserv Genet. 2022;23(2):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s10592-022-01429-7. Epub 2022 Jan 16. Conserv Genet. 2022. PMID: 35401067 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources