The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions
- PMID: 18173507
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03456.x
The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions
Abstract
A major challenge of invasion biology is the development of a predictive framework that prevents new invasions. This is inherently difficult because different biological characteristics are important at the different stages of invasion: opportunity/transport, establishment and spread. Here, we draw from recent research on a variety of taxa to examine the evolutionary causes and consequences of biological invasions. The process of introduction may favour species with characteristics that promote success in highly disturbed, human-dominated landscapes, thus exerting novel forms of selection on introduced populations. Moreover, evidence is accumulating that multiple introductions can often be critical to the successful establishment and spread of introduced species, as they may be important sources of genetic variation necessary for adaptation in new environments or may permit the introduction of novel traits. Thus, not only should the introduction of new species be prevented, but substantial effort should also be directed to preventing the secondary introduction of previously established species (and even movement of individuals among introduced populations). Modern molecular techniques can take advantage of genetic changes postintroduction to determine the source of introduced populations and their vectors of spread, and to elucidate the mechanisms of success of some invasive species. Moreover, the growing availability of genomic tools will permit the identification of underlying genetic causes of invasive success.
Similar articles
-
Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):431-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03538.x. Epub 2007 Oct 1. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 17908213
-
Multiple sources, admixture, and genetic variation in introduced anolis lizard populations.Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1612-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00826.x. Conserv Biol. 2007. PMID: 18173485
-
Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):373-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03503.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 17868309
-
Facing change: forms and foundations of contemporary adaptation to biotic invasions.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):361-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03484.x. Epub 2007 Sep 3. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 17784919 Review.
-
Adaptive evolution in invasive species.Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 May 28. Trends Plant Sci. 2008. PMID: 18467157 Review.
Cited by
-
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Dec;95(6):1511-1534. doi: 10.1111/brv.12627. Epub 2020 Jun 25. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020. PMID: 32588508 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive predators deplete genetic diversity of island lizards.PLoS One. 2010 Aug 10;5(8):e12061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012061. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20706576 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic architecture of contemporary adaptation to biotic invasions: quantitative trait locus mapping of beak reduction in soapberry bugs.G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Feb 19;4(2):255-64. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.008334. G3 (Bethesda). 2014. PMID: 24347624 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling an ancient biological invasion: molecular analysis of an old European alien, the crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata).BMC Evol Biol. 2009 May 18;9:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-109. BMC Evol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19450273 Free PMC article.
-
How much variation can one ant species hold? Species delimitation in the Crematogaster kelleri-group in Madagascar.PLoS One. 2013 Jul 9;8(7):e68082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068082. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23874503 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources