Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):464-9.

Electromyographic analysis of the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles during 3 common rehabilitation exercises

Affiliations

Electromyographic analysis of the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles during 3 common rehabilitation exercises

Michael M Reinold et al. J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Context: Investigators have observed electromyographic (EMG) activity of the supraspinatus muscle and reported conflicting results.

Objective: To quantify EMG activity of the supraspinatus, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid muscles during exercises commonly used in rehabilitation.

Design: One-factor, repeated-measures design.

Setting: Controlled laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Twenty-two asymptomatic subjects (15 men, 7 women) with no history of shoulder injury participated.

Main outcomes measure(s): The dominant shoulder was tested. Fine-wire EMG electrodes were inserted into the supraspinatus, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid muscles. The EMG data were collected at 960 Hz for analysis during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and 5 repetitions of 3 exercises: standing elevation in the scapular plane ("full can"), standing elevation in the scapular plane with glenohumeral internal rotation ("empty can"), and prone horizontal abduction at 100 degrees with glenohumeral external rotation ("prone full can"). We calculated 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P < .05) and post hoc 2-tailed, paired t tests to detect significant differences in muscle activity among exercises.

Results: No statistical difference existed among the exercises for the supraspinatus. The middle deltoid showed significantly greater activity during the empty-can exercise (77 +/- 44% MVIC) and prone full-can exercise (63 +/- 31% MVIC) than during the full-can exercise (52 +/- 27% MVIC) (P = .001 and .017, respectively). The posterior deltoid showed significantly greater activity during the prone full-can exercise (87 +/- 53% MVIC) than during the full-can (P = .001) and the empty-can (P = .005) exercises and significantly greater activity during the empty-can exercise (54 +/- 24% MVIC) than during the full-can exercise (38 +/- 32% MVIC) (P = .012).

Conclusions: While all 3 exercises produced similar amounts of supraspinatus activity, the full-can exercise produced significantly less activity of the deltoid muscles and may be the optimal position to recruit the supraspinatus muscle for rehabilitation and testing. The empty-can exercise may be a good exercise to recruit the middle deltoid muscle, and the prone full-can exercise may be a good exercise to recruit the posterior deltoid muscle.

Keywords: dynamic stabilization; empty-can exercises; full-can exercises; prone full-can exercises; rotator cuff; scaption; shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The full-can exercise. The subject elevates the upper extremity at approximately 30° of horizontal abduction in the plane of the scapula and full glenohumeral external rotation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The empty-can exercise. The subject elevates the upper extremity at approximately 30° of horizontal abduction in the plane of the scapula and full glenohumeral internal rotation.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The prone full-can exercise. The subject performs prone horizontal abduction at approximately 100° of glenohumeral abduction and full external rotation.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The resultant force vectors of the shoulder during arm elevation with the arm in neutral (N), external rotation similar to the full-can exercise (X) and internal rotation similar to the empty-can exercise (I). Note the superiorly oriented force vector with internal rotation at 30° and 60° of elevation. Reprinted with permission from Poppen NK, Walker PS. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;135:165–170.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The resultant force vectors of the deltoid (A), supraspinatus (B), and combined deltoid and supraspinatus (C) during arm elevation from 30° to 150°. Note the superiorly oriented force vector of the deltoid (A) from 30°–120° of elevation when simultaneous supraspinatus activity is not present. The supraspinatus (B) provides a compressive force that centralizes the humeral head within the glenoid fossa throughout the range of motion. This figure was published in Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, eds, The Shoulder, Morrey BF, Itoi, E, An KA, Biomechanics of the shoulder, 233–276, Copyright WB Saunders 1998.

References

    1. Morrey BF, Itoi E, An KA. Biomechanics of the shoulder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, eds. The Shoulder. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1998:233–276.
    1. Wilk KE, Arrigo C. Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the athletic shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18:365–378. - PubMed
    1. Bassett RW, Browne AO, Morrey BF, An KN. Glenohumeral muscle force and movement mechanics in a position of shoulder instability. J Biomech. 1990;23:405–415. - PubMed
    1. De Duca CJ, Forrest WJ. Force analysis of individual muscles acting simultaneously on the shoulder joint during isometric abduction. J Biomech. 1973;6:385–393. - PubMed
    1. Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1944;26:1–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources