Comparison of the premier toxin A and B assay and the TOX A/B II assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
- PMID: 18175802
- PMCID: PMC2268262
- DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00282-07
Comparison of the premier toxin A and B assay and the TOX A/B II assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection
Abstract
Clostridium difficile causes nosocomial diarrhea and is responsible for complications such as pseudomembranous colitis, megacolon, and perforation. Using 442 stool specimens, we compared the sensitivities and specificities of the Premier toxin A and B (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) and C. difficile TOX A/B II (TechLab, Inc., Blacksburg, VA) immunoassays in the Virology Department of the Kaiser Permanente Regional Reference Laboratories. The Premier toxin A and B assay demonstrated a higher sensitivity (97.44%) and a higher positive predictive value (79.17%) than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (87.18% and 75.56%, respectively), while assay specificities and negative predictive values were similar. We also performed experiments using serially diluted, purified toxin A and B antigens to understand the basis for assay differences. The two assays' toxin A antibodies detected toxin A at comparable levels. Preliminary results indicated that the toxin B antibody in the Premier toxin A and B assay could detect toxin B at a concentration of 125 pg/100 microl, while the toxin B antibody in the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay could not detect toxin B below a concentration of 250 pg/100 microl. Therefore, the Premier toxin A and B assay provides greater sensitivity than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay, perhaps due to a superior detection ability of its toxin B antibody.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in swine.Vet Microbiol. 2008 Apr 1;128(1-2):204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.022. Epub 2007 Oct 2. Vet Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18006252
-
Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Oct;42(10):4863-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4863-4865.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15472364 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of TechLab C. DIFF QUIK CHEK and TechLab C. DIFFICILE TOX A/B II for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;59(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jul 26. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17662566
-
Clostridium Difficile, Colitis, and Colonoscopy: Pediatric Perspective.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):34. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0571-z. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28707191 Review.
-
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Aug;7(8):411-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1198-743x.2001.00294.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001. PMID: 11591203 Review.
Cited by
-
Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Should Be Screened for Clostridium difficile Colitis.Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):3124-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3707-8. Epub 2015 May 19. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25986524
-
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: comparison of four methods on specimens collected in Cary-Blair transport medium and tcdB PCR on fresh versus frozen samples.Infect Dis Rep. 2011 May 5;3(1):e5. doi: 10.4081/idr.2011.e5. eCollection 2011 Mar 8. Infect Dis Rep. 2011. PMID: 24470904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20071552 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3729-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01280-09. Epub 2009 Sep 9. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19741082 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Case Definitions on Efficacy Estimation in Clinical Trials-A Proof-of-Principle Based on Historical Examples.Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jul 4;9(7):379. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9070379. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32635553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Johnson, S., S. A. Kent, K. J. O'Leary, M. M. Merrigan, S. P. Sambol, L. R. Peterson, and D. N. Gerding. 2001. Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant Clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay. Ann. Intern. Med. 135:434-438. - PubMed
-
- Kelly, C. P., C. Pothoulakis, and J. T. LaMont. 1994. Clostridium difficile colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:257-262. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical