Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jan;121(1):251-257.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000293866.57517.d4.

Rhinoplasty: an outcome research

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Rhinoplasty: an outcome research

Jean-Paul Meningaud et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Background: A bicentric, prospective cohort study was performed to assess the outcome of rhinoplasties from the patient's perspective.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients scheduled for rhinoplasty from two different hospitals (public and private) were examined before and after surgery using the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation, a specific validated assessment scale. For statistical analysis, paired Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney test were applied. Student's t test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores.

Results: The scores of both the cosmetic and the posttraumatic patients were significantly improved by rhinoplasty (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference when the authors compared the improvement scores of subgroups ranged by age, sex, primary versus secondary rhinoplasty, time between first consultation and surgery, posttraumatic versus non-posttraumatic patients, and functional versus nonfunctional indications.

Conclusions: Whatever the type of initial demand (posttraumatic, cosmetic, or functional), rhinoplasty significantly increased Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation scores. The study design did not allow the authors to determine subgroups of patients more able to obtain an important improvement score.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Davis, A. M., Simons, R. L., and Rhee, J. S. Evaluation of the Goldman tip procedure in modern-day rhinoplasty. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 6: 301, 2004.
    1. Ching, S., Thoma, A., McCabe, R. E., and Antony, M. M. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111: 469, 2003.
    1. Alsarraf, R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 24: 192, 2000.
    1. Gryskiewicz, J. M., and Gryskiewicz, K. M. Nasal osteotomies: A clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 1445, 2004.
    1. Ford, C. N., Battaglia, D. G., and Gentry, L. R. Preservation of periosteal attachment in lateral osteotomy. Ann. Plast. Surg. 13: 107, 1984.

LinkOut - more resources