Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease
- PMID: 18176638
- PMCID: PMC2082087
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03086017
Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease
Abstract
Objective: In this multicentre study, we investigated the long-term prognostic value of intracoronary derived haemodynamic parameters compared with the results of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).
Methods: Patients (n=191) who were referred for angioplasty of a severe lesion in the presence of an intermediate lesion in another coronary artery were included. MPS was performed to determine the presence of reversible perfusion defects in the area of the intermediate lesion. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and additionally fractional flow reserve (FFR; n=129), were determined distal to the intermediate lesion; CFVR >/=2.0 and FFR >/=0.75 were considered negative.
Results: In total 67 events occurred in 49 patients (3 deaths, 9 MI, 9 CABG, 46 PTCA) during a mean of 793 days follow-up. Event-free survival was 63% for MPS, 79% for CFVR, and 79% for FFR if a negative test result was obtained. The relative risk was 1.2 (not significant) for MPS, 2.2 (p=0.001) for CFVR, and 2.4 (p=0.004) for FFR.
Conclusion: Selective evaluation of an intermediate lesion using CFVR or FFR allows more adequate risk stratification in patients with multivessel disease than MPS. A CFVR <2.0 or a FFR <0.75 was associated with a significant increase of the occurrence of cardiac events during long-term follow-up, predominantly associated with revascularisation. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:369-74.).
Keywords: angioplasty; coronary artery disease; coronary flow velocity reserve; fractional flow reserve; myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; risk stratification.
Figures
References
-
- Berman DS, Germano G, Shaw LJ. The role of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 1999;29:280-97. - PubMed
-
- Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech J-W, De Bruyne B, Eeckhout E, Fearon WF, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1321-41. - PubMed
-
- Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, Deckelbaum LI, Joye JD, Dahlberg ST, et al. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. Circulation 1997;96:484-90. - PubMed
-
- Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, van der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-8. - PubMed
-
- Chamuleau SAJ, Meuwissen M, Van Eck-Smit BLF, Koch KT, de Jong A, de Winter RJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1316-22. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources