Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;136(10):1425-31.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268807000118. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

Plastic detection comb better than visual screening for diagnosis of head louse infestation

C Balcioglu  1 , I F Burgess, M E Limoncu, M T Sahin, Y Ozbel, C Bilaç, O Kurt, K S Larsen
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Plastic detection comb better than visual screening for diagnosis of head louse infestation

C Balcioglu et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Finding lice can be difficult in head louse infestation. We compared a new louse detection comb with visual inspection. All children in two rural Turkish schools were screened by the two methods. Those with lice were offered treatment and the results monitored by detection combing. Children with nits only were re-screened to identify latent infestations. Using visual inspection we found 214/461 children (46%) with nits but only 30 (6.5%) with live lice. In contrast detection combing found 96 (21%) with live lice, of whom 20 had no nits. Detection combing was 3.84 times more effective than visual inspection for finding live lice. Only 10/138 (7.2%) children with nits and no lice were found to have active infestation by day 16. We found that the detection comb is significantly (P<0.001) more effective than visual screening for diagnosis; that nits are not a good indicator of active infestation; and that treatment with 1% permethrin was 89.6% effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart to show diagnostic and treatment outcomes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
‘PDC’ plastic head louse detection comb.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anon. The Head Lice Diagnostic Pocket Pack. 2nd edn. Cambridge: BLM Health; 1992.
    1. Williams KL et al. Lice, nits and school policy. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1011–1015. - PubMed
    1. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Spielman A. overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestations in North America. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2000;19:689–693. - PubMed
    1. Mumçuoglu KY et al. Louse comb versus direct visual examination for the diagnosis of head louse infestations. Pediatric Dermatology. 2001;18:9–12. - PubMed
    1. De Maeseneer J et al. Wet combing versus traditional scalp inspection to detect head lice in schoolchildren: observational study. British Medical Journal. 2000;321:1187–1188. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types