The effects of cycling cadence on the phases of joint power, crank power, force and force effectiveness
- PMID: 18178104
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.009
The effects of cycling cadence on the phases of joint power, crank power, force and force effectiveness
Abstract
We examined the influence of cadence in cycling technique by quantifying phase relationships for a number of important variables at the crank and lower extremity joints. Any difference in the effect of cadence on force, effectiveness, and power phases would indicate an essential change in coordination pattern. Cycle kinetics was recorded for 10 male competitive cyclists at five cadences (60-100 rpm) at submaximal load (260 W). Joint powers were calculated using inverse dynamics methods. All data were expressed as a function of crank position. The phase of the crank mechanical profiles (total force, crank and joint power, and effectiveness) was calculated using four methods: crank angle of maximum (MA) and minimum (MI), fitting a sine wave (SI) and by cross-correlation (XC). These methods, apart from the MA method, showed the same relative phase. The variables, however, showed different phases being expressed as time lag: force effectiveness: 0.131 (+/-0.034)s; total force: 0.149 (+/-0.021)s; power: 0.098 (+/-0.027)s. The phases in joint powers hip 0.071 (+/-0.008), knee 0.082 (+/-0.009), and hip 0.077 (+/-0.012) were only well described by XC, and were somewhat lower than the crank power phase. These differences indicate the potential effect of inertia of the lower limb in phase shifts from joints to crank. Furthermore, the differences between the various crank variables indicate a change of technique with cadence.
Similar articles
-
Effects on the crank torque profile when changing pedalling cadence in level ground and uphill road cycling.J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1003-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.037. J Biomech. 2005. PMID: 15797582 Clinical Trial.
-
Crank inertial load has little effect on steady-state pedaling coordination.J Biomech. 1996 Dec;29(12):1559-67. J Biomech. 1996. PMID: 8945654
-
Cycling exercise and the determination of electromechanical delay.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007 Oct;17(5):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.07.005. Epub 2006 Sep 20. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007. PMID: 16990013
-
Power, muscular work, and external forces in cycling.Ergonomics. 1994 Jan;37(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963620. Ergonomics. 1994. PMID: 8112280 Review.
-
Electromyographic analysis of pedaling: a review.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Apr;19(2):182-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.10.010. Epub 2008 Feb 21. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009. PMID: 18093842 Review.
Cited by
-
On the effect of changing handgrip position on joint specific power and cycling kinematics in recreational and professional cyclists.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237768. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32813742 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between cadence, pedalling technique and gross efficiency in cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Dec;111(12):2885-93. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1914-3. Epub 2011 Mar 25. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011. PMID: 21437606 Free PMC article.
-
Joint specific power production in cycling: The effect of cadence and intensity.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212781. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30794700 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Oxygenation, local muscle oxygen consumption and joint specific power in cycling: the effect of cadence at a constant external work rate.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jun;116(6):1207-17. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3379-x. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27126859 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Different Cadence on Paddling Gross Efficiency and Economy in Stand-Up Paddle Boarding.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 7;17(13):4893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134893. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32645890 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources