Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;56(2):191-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01557.x. Epub 2007 Dec 24.

Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and cognitive function in older people: analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Iain A Lang  1 , David J Llewellyn, Kenneth M Langa, Robert B Wallace, Felicia A Huppert, David Melzer
Affiliations

Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and cognitive function in older people: analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Iain A Lang et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the relationship between cognitive function, socioeconomic status, and neighborhood deprivation (lack of local resources of all types, financial and otherwise).

Design: Nationally representative cross-section.

Setting: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).

Participants: Seven thousand one hundred twenty-six community-dwelling individuals aged 52 and older and resident in urban areas.

Measurements: Individual cognitive function score and index of multiple deprivation (IMD) at the Super Output Area level, adjusting for health, lifestyle, and sociodemographic confounders. Analyses were conducted separately according to sex and age group (52-69 and > or = 70).

Results: IMD affected cognitive function independent of the effects of education and socioeconomic status. For example, in fully adjusted models, women aged 70 and older had a standardized cognitive function score (z-score) that was 0.20 points (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.01-0.39) lower in the bottom 20% of wealth than the top 20%, 0.44 points (95% CI=0.20-0.69) lower in the least-educated group than in the most educated, and 0.31 points (95% CI 0.15-0.48) lower if resident lived in an area in the bottom 20% of IMD than in the top 20%.

Conclusion: In community-based older people in urban neighborhoods, neighborhood deprivation--living in a neighborhood with high levels of deprivation, compared with national levels--is associated with cognitive function independent of individual socioeconomic circumstances. The mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear and warrant further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Iain A. Lang is an Academic Specialist Trainee in Public Health supported by the NHS South-West Region Public Health Training Scheme. David J. Llewellyn was supported by grants from the Health Foundation (543/2216) and the Isaac Newton Trust. The authors have no financial disclosure to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean standardized cognition score according to neighborhood index of multiple deprivation (IMD) divided into quintiles.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stimpson JP, Ju H, Raji MA, et al. Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31:215–222. - PubMed
    1. Winkleby M, Sundquist K, Cubbin C. Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:97–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davey Smith G, Hart C, Watt G, et al. Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality: The Renfrew and Paisley study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:399–405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galea S, Ahern J, Nandi A, et al. Urban neighborhood poverty and the incidence of depression in a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:171–179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose D, Richards R. Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US food stamp program. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:1081–1088. - PubMed

Publication types