Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Dec 21;8(4):E110.
doi: 10.1208/pt0804110.

In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review

Affiliations
Review

In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review

Jolyon Mitchell et al. AAPS PharmSciTech. .

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to discuss the roles of cascade impactor (CI) data in inhaler assessment and to examine the relationship between aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) and the clinical response to inhaled drugs. A systematic literature search of studies linking APSD to clinical response was undertaken. Two distinct roles for CI-generated data were identified: (1) the control of inhaler/drug product quality; and (2) the provision of data that may be predictive of particle deposition in the respiratory tract. Method robustness is required for the former application, combined with simplicity in operation, resulting in rudimentary attempts to mimic the anatomy of the respiratory tract. The latter necessitates making the apparatus and its operation more closely resemble patient use of the inhaler. A CI cannot perfectly simulate the respiratory tract, since it operates at constant flow rate, while the respiratory cycle has a varying flow-time profile. On the basis of a review of studies linking APSD to clinical response of inhaled drugs, it is concluded that attempts to use CI-generated data from quality control testing to compare products for bioequivalence are likely to have only limited success, as links between laboratory-measured APSD, particle deposition in the respiratory tract, and clinical response are not straightforward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW. Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their use and limitations. J Aerosol Med. 2003;16:341–377. doi: 10.1089/089426803772455622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Section 2.9.18—Preparations for inhalation: aerodynamic assessment of fine particles. In:European Pharmacopeia. 5th ed. Strasbourg, France: European Pharmacopeia; 2005:2799–2811.
    1. US Pharmacopeia. Chapter USP. 601—Physical tests and determinations: aerosols. In:US Pharmacopeia 30—National Formulary 25. Rockville, MD: US Pharmacopeial Convention; 2007:220–240.
    1. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW. Particle size analysis of aerosols from medicinal inhalers. KONA: Powder Particle. 2000;22:32–65.
    1. Christopher D, Curry P, Doub B, et al. Considerations for the development and practice of cascade impaction testing including a mass balance failure investigation tree. J Aerosol Med. 2003;16:235–247. doi: 10.1089/089426803769017604. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources