The US Food and Drug Administration and probiotics: regulatory categorization
- PMID: 18181719
- DOI: 10.1086/523324
The US Food and Drug Administration and probiotics: regulatory categorization
Abstract
Probiotics are living microorganisms that, when consumed, have the potential to confer a beneficial health effect. Unfortunately for purveyors of probiotic products, the system of regulation delineated in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is anything but "one size fits all." How a probiotic product is used or is intended to be used will govern the regulatory category or categories that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will assign to the product. The extent and nature of the restraints and data-collection requirements that may be imposed on the marketing of a product hinge on how a product is categorized under the Act. More specifically, the categorization of a product governs the respective regulatory burdens of an industry sponsor and the FDA. Premarket systems, such as those for new drugs and biologics, place a heavy evidentiary burden on the sponsor of a product. Postmarket systems, such as those for dietary supplements, place, at least initially, a higher regulatory evidentiary burden on the FDA than on the product sponsor. This article explains regulatory categorizations under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and their effects regarding the federal regulation of probiotic products.
Similar articles
-
Health-benefit claims for probiotic products.Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;46 Suppl 2:S122-4; discussion S144-51. doi: 10.1086/523327. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 18181716
-
US Food and Drug Administration regulations governing label claims for food products, including probiotics.Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;46 Suppl 2:S119-21; discussion S144-51. doi: 10.1086/523328. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 18181715
-
FDA regulation of dietary supplements and requirements regarding adverse event reporting.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):239-44. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.263. Epub 2009 Dec 23. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010. PMID: 20032973
-
Functional foods: the Food and Drug Administration perspective.Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6 Suppl):1735S-8S; discussion 1739S-42S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1735S. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000. PMID: 10837331 Review.
-
Ephedra: yesterday, DSHEA, and tomorrow--a ten year perspective on the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.J Herb Pharmacother. 2005;5(3):67-86. J Herb Pharmacother. 2005. PMID: 16520299 Review.
Cited by
-
Limosilactobacillus fermentum from buffalo milk is suitable for potential biotechnological process development and inhibits Helicobacter pylori in a gastric epithelial cell model.Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2022 Apr 18;34:e00732. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00732. eCollection 2022 Jun. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2022. PMID: 35686014 Free PMC article.
-
Direct-fed Microbials (DFM) and Poultry Genomics: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Antibiotic Free Farming.Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10618-y. Online ahead of print. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025. PMID: 40515794 Review.
-
Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins: Classification, Biosynthesis and Applications against Uropathogens: A Mini-Review.Molecules. 2017 Jul 26;22(8):1255. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081255. Molecules. 2017. PMID: 28933759 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cell viability and functionality of probiotic bacteria in dairy products.Front Microbiol. 2011 May 3;2:70. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00070. eCollection 2011. Front Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21833320 Free PMC article.
-
Nutraceuticals in Pregnancy: A Special Focus on Probiotics.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 7;25(17):9688. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179688. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39273635 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical