Use of ANOVA to estimate inter- and intra-reader variability for a group of readers in thorough QT/QTc studies
- PMID: 18183035
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100481
Use of ANOVA to estimate inter- and intra-reader variability for a group of readers in thorough QT/QTc studies
Abstract
The E14 guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization require that all new drugs that have systemic bioavailability be subjected to a thorough QT/QTc study to look for possible effects on cardiac repolarization. Recent publications have discussed various aspects of thorough QTc studies. The thorough QTc study is designed to detect a mean drug-induced QTc prolongation of >5 ms with an upper bound of the 95% one-sided confidence limits of >10 ms. The E14 guideline has spelled out the procedures to be followed in a thorough QT/QTc study, including choice of subjects, methods of electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition, details of ECG analysis, and statistical analysis of the study data. Since the measurement of the QT interval is a relatively subjective assessment, the ECGs must be analyzed in a central ECG laboratory by "a few skilled readers." In order to maintain quality in ECG interpretation, the E14 guidelines have two requirements. First, as a measure of the assay sensitivity, the study must include an active control known to prolong the QTc interval. Second, a certain percentage of ECGs must be subjected to an inter- and intra-reader variability analysis; these data are submitted to the regulatory authorities along with the study results.
Similar articles
-
Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Dec;27(12):1659-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00701.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004. PMID: 15613131
-
Literature review and pilot studies of the effect of QT correction formulas on reported beta2-agonist-induced QTc prolongation.Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.010. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16750469 Clinical Trial.
-
Statistical issues including design and sample size calculation in thorough QT/QTc studies.J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(3):451-67. doi: 10.1080/10543400802020938. J Biopharm Stat. 2008. PMID: 18470755
-
Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement.J Electrocardiol. 2006 Oct;39(4 Suppl):S152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2006.05.030. Epub 2006 Aug 21. J Electrocardiol. 2006. PMID: 16920141 Review.
-
Multiple comparisons of repeated measured response: issues of assessment of prolongation of QT interval in thorough QT trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2010 May;20(3):604-14. doi: 10.1080/10543400903582034. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 20358439 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of two methods of estimating reader variability in QT interval measurements in thorough QT/QTc studies.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014 Mar;19(2):182-9. doi: 10.1111/anec.12136. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014. PMID: 24521536 Free PMC article.
-
A Resting ECG Screening Protocol Improved with Artificial Intelligence for the Early Detection of Cardiovascular Risk in Athletes.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 16;15(4):477. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040477. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002628 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources